Making Diagnostic Decisions Count: Design and Development of a Virtual Patient Environment for Fostering Medical Education

被引:0
作者
Sharma, Saroj [1 ]
Thiel, Carolin [2 ]
Yildiz, Daniela [2 ]
Weinberger, Armin [1 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, Dept Educ Technol, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Saarland Univ, Expt & Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, PZMS, Kirrberger Str 100, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
来源
TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING FOR INCLUSIVE AND EQUITABLE QUALITY EDUCATION, PT II, EC-TEL 2024 | 2024年 / 15160卷
关键词
Virtual Patients; Clinical Reasoning; Diagnostic Competence; Problem Based Learning; Medical Education; Technology-Enhanced Learning;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-72312-4_23
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Virtual patients (VPs) are found to be efficient tools for building diagnostic competence and clinical reasoning in medical students. Here, we present an approach that includes additional game elements, namely counters that keep track of various costs of the diagnostic decisions. The initial pilot studies show unanimous acceptance of the platform as a learning tool among medical students with varying degrees of prior knowledge. In qualitative interviews, students refer to the counters as "good reflection," "increasing the feeling of responsibility" and evaluated it as an incentive for intense group discussion. This has shown to be helpful in designing instructional tools to foster medical education, also allowing medicine instructors to create their own VP environments and patient cases, tune the respective instructional design, and launch VPs for specific learning purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 175
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Azmi S., 2015, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, V10, P18087
  • [2] The Role for Virtual Patients in the Future of Medical Education
    Berman, Norman B.
    Durning, Steven J.
    Fischer, Martin R.
    Huwendiek, Soren
    Triola, Marc M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2016, 91 (09) : 1217 - 1222
  • [3] Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Triola, Marc M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (10) : 1589 - 1602
  • [4] Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students
    Huwendiek, Soeren
    Reichert, Friedrich
    Bosse, Hans-Martin
    de Leng, Bas A.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    Haag, Martin
    Hoffmann, Georg F.
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (06) : 580 - 588
  • [5] Kenny P, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4722, P197
  • [6] Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact
    Kiesewetter, Jan
    Sailer, Michael
    Jung, Valentina M.
    Schoenberger, Regina
    Bauer, Elisabeth
    Zottmann, Jan M.
    Hege, Inga
    Zimmermann, Hanna
    Fischer, Frank
    Fischer, Martin R.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Virtual patients - what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education
    Kononowicz, Andrzej A.
    Zary, Nabil
    Edelbring, Samuel
    Corral, Janet
    Hege, Inga
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 15
  • [8] High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
    Massoth, Christina
    Roeder, Hannah
    Ohlenburg, Hendrik
    Hessler, Michael
    Zarbock, Alexander
    Poepping, Daniel M.
    Wenk, Manuel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [9] 12 Tips: Guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases
    Posel, Nancy
    Fleiszer, David
    Shore, Bruce M.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (08) : 701 - 708
  • [10] Wehe H.S., 2015, Evidence for the negative impact of reward on self-regulated learning