Examining implementation outcomes in health information exchange systems: A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Lum, Bonnie [1 ]
Weerasinghe, Navisha [1 ]
Chu, Charlene H. [1 ]
Perri, Dan [2 ]
Cranley, Lisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Bloomberg Fac Nursing, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Care transitions; Health information exchange; Interoperable technologies; Implementation outcomes; Implementation outcome framework; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; USER ACCEPTANCE; RECORD ADOPTION; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; HOSPITALS; SUCCESS; USAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104782
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background: Health information exchange (HIE) facilitates the secure exchange of digital health data across disparate health systems and settings. The implementation of information technology projects in healthcare is complex, further complicated by the fact that implementation success, through the measure of implementation outcomes, has been inconsistently defined and evaluated. There is no known scoping review examining implementation success through implementation outcomes in the field of HIE technologies. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a synthesis of studies related to reported implementation outcomes of HIE solutions (and related interoperability technologies) with a goal to inform the implementation of large-scale HIE projects in the future. Methods: A scoping review, guided by the Arksey and O'Malley Framework, was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science), gathering studies from January 2010 to June 2023. Studies that described the implementation of a technology supporting interoperability or HIE across different organizations and/or across different healthcare settings and described the evaluation of one or more implementation outcomes from the Implementation Outcome Framework (IOF) were included. Results: 37 studies were included in this review. The implementation outcome adoption was most frequently reported (n = 24). Fidelity and penetration were not reported. Few studies provided definitions for the outcomes being evaluated. Few studies provided details surrounding the stage of implementation as it relates to the outcome examined. No studies used the IOF or other similar implementation science evaluation frameworks. Conclusion: This review highlights the existing gaps in the field of HIE/interoperability solutions implementation studies. Future studies should employ theoretical frameworks to guide their research, standardize language used to describe implementation outcomes, and expand knowledge of salient outcomes at varying stages of implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BARRIERS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Stamatian, Florin
    Baba, Catalin Ovidiu
    Timofe, Mara Paula
    TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2013, : 156 - 173
  • [2] Adoption and implementation of Health Information Exchange (HIE): An interpretative review
    Zadeh, Pouyan Esmaeil
    AMCIS 2015 PROCEEDINGS, 2015,
  • [3] The effects of simulation training on learning of health information systems: A scoping review
    Nabovati, Ehsan
    Jeddi, Fatemeh Rangraz
    Ghaffari, Faeze
    Mirhoseini, Fakhrosadat
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 11 (01) : 4
  • [4] A scoping review of geographic information systems in maternal health
    Makanga, Prestige T.
    Schuurman, Nadine
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    Firoz, Tabassum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 134 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [5] Health Information Systems Implementation: Review of change management issues
    Teixeira, Paulo
    ADVANCES TECHNIQUES IN COMPUTING SCIENCES AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2010, : 347 - 350
  • [6] Implementation of digital health interventions in rehabilitation: A scoping review
    Pearce, Louise
    Costa, Nathalia
    Sherrington, Catherine
    Hassett, Leanne
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 37 (11) : 1533 - 1551
  • [7] A user needs assessment to inform health information exchange design and implementation
    Strauss, Alexandra T.
    Martinez, Diego A.
    Garcia-Arce, Andres
    Taylor, Stephanie
    Mateja, Candice
    Fabri, Peter J.
    Zayas-Castro, Jose L.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [8] Health information exchange policies of 11 diverse health systems and the associated impact on volume of exchange
    Downing, N. Lance
    Adler-Milstein, Julia
    Palma, Jonathan P.
    Lane, Steven
    Eisenberg, Matthew
    Sharp, Christopher
    Longhurst, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (01) : 113 - 122
  • [9] Doctors' Orders or Patients' Preferences? Examining the Role of Physicians in Patients' Privacy Decisions on Health Information Exchange Platforms
    Yaraghi, Niam
    Gopal, Ram D.
    Ramesh, Ramaswamy
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 20 (07): : 928 - 952
  • [10] Use patterns of health information exchange systems and admission decisions: Reductionistic and configurational approaches
    Politi, Liran
    Codish, Shlomi
    Sagy, Iftach
    Fink, Lior
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (12) : 1029 - 1038