Clinical ethics consultations in France: origins, perspectives and premises of a collective

被引:0
作者
Galmiche, Perrine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP U1018, F-94807 Villejuif, France
[2] AP HP, Ctr Eth Clin, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Collectif Consultations Eth Clin France, Paris, France
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BIOETHIQUE | 2024年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
clinical ethics; clinical ethics consultation; medical ethics; exploratory survey; state of the art; France;
D O I
10.7202/1114957ar
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In France, the practice of clinical ethics, and more specifically of clinical ethics consultation (CEC), is marked both by a heritage of practices from across the Atlantic and by a desire to adapt to the needs of the national context, which is increasingly giving a voice to patients. While the practice remained marginal in France for a long time, a number of structures developed in the wake of the Covid-19 health crisis. The aim of this article is to take an initial national look at the practice of CEC in France, from its origins to its prospects. An exploratory questionnaire was drawn up by 5 teams offering CEC and linked by a historic partnership. It consisted of 4 parts: presentation of the structure, form taken by the CEC, whether or not they agreed with the fundamental proposals, and whether or not they wanted to form a national CEC collective. The results cover 38 organizations, 26 of which say they practice CEC. Although the practices of these 26 organizations varied, they all agreed on the objective of offering case-by-case medical decision support, with the majority adhering to the basic principles identified and wishing to participate in a CEC collective. This initial exploration provides an opportunity to put the practice of CEC in France into perspective in the international context and opens up prospects for collective work on the practical and methodological fundamentals, both by drawing on the similarities and the differences between different countries.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 56
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] The Current State and Challenges of Clinical Ethics Consultation for Prenatal Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Committee Employee Perspectives in China
    Wu, Ying
    Hao, Tianchi
    Liu, Xing
    Zhang, Xin
    Zhong, Yuqiong
    Luo, Dan
    Wang, Xiaomin
    ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2025, 17 (01) : 73 - 90
  • [22] Clinical Ethics and the Observant Jewish and Muslim Patient: Shared Theocentric Perspectives in Practice
    Hossain, Fahmida
    Gabbay, Ezra
    Fins, Joseph J.
    CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2024,
  • [23] How do national guidelines frame clinical ethics practice? A comparative analysis of guidelines from the US, the UK, Canada and France
    Gaucher, Nathalie
    Lantos, John
    Payot, Antoine
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 85 : 74 - 78
  • [24] How to deal with the criterion of severe mental distress for late termination of pregnancy? A scoping literature review and a content analysis of clinical ethics consultations
    Wetterauer, Charlotte
    Schuermann, Jan
    Winkler, Laura
    Westermair, Anna Lisa
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Tschudin, Sibil
    Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin
    Trachsel, Manuel
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [25] What Ethical Issues Really Arise in Practice at an Academic Medical Center? A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Ethics Consultations from 2008 to 2013
    Wasson K.
    Anderson E.
    Hagstrom E.
    McCarthy M.
    Parsi K.
    Kuczewski M.
    HEC Forum, 2016, 28 (3) : 217 - 228
  • [26] Ethics of the Electrified Mind: Defining Issues and Perspectives on the Principled Use of Brain Stimulation in Medical Research and Clinical Care
    Cabrera, Laura Y.
    Evans, Emily L.
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2014, 27 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [27] Ethics of the Electrified Mind: Defining Issues and Perspectives on the Principled Use of Brain Stimulation in Medical Research and Clinical Care
    Laura Y. Cabrera
    Emily L. Evans
    Roy H. Hamilton
    Brain Topography, 2014, 27 : 33 - 45