Medical authority on anti-vaccine WhatsApp groups in Brazil

被引:0
作者
Carlos, Giovana Santana [1 ]
Maia, Lidia Raquel Herculano [1 ]
Massarani, Luisa [1 ]
Oliveira, Thaiane [1 ]
Maia, Francisco Jadson Silva [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Inst Nacl Comunicacao Publ Ciencia & Tecnol INCT C, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
medical authority; anti-vaccine movement; misinformation; COVID-19; Brazil; WhatsApp;
D O I
10.7764/cdi.60.82122
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In this article, we analyze how medical authority is used in the production and legitimization of anti-vaccine opinions in Brazilian WhatsApp groups, from July 20, 2022 to July 31, 2023 by searching for descriptors related to the topic of vaccines, which led to the identification of five anti-vaccine groups in this application. Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted an analysis of the key tactical and discursive articulations around healthcare professionals, reflected in 945 messages shared in these groups. In this analysis, we found that medical authority is primarily used to support opinions against the safety and efficacity of vaccines, to glorify anti-vaccination doctors and to oppose physicians with positions other than those of the antivaccination movement. The analysis thus shows that these groups maintain a dubious relationship with medical authority, which is challenged in the process of forming and consolidating the beliefs and opinions on health shared there. In this context, we observed that users perceive the antivaccination groups studied here as safe spaces for finding and recommending doctors who share antivaccination views, reinforcing the scenario of misinformation based on medical authority in the contemporary era.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 167
页数:25
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [11] Identifying the prevalence, correlates, and policy consequences of anti-vaccine social identity
    Motta, Matt
    Callaghan, Timothy
    Sylvester, Steven
    Lunz-Trujillo, Kristin
    POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES, 2023, 11 (01) : 108 - 122
  • [12] Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories
    Jolley, Daniel
    Douglas, Karen M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 47 (08) : 459 - 469
  • [13] Here we go again: the reemergence of anti-vaccine activism on the Internet
    de Camargo Jr, Kenneth Rochel
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2020, 36
  • [14] Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults
    Dordevic, J. Milosevic
    Mari, S.
    Vdovic, M.
    Milosevic, A.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 277
  • [15] Citizen participation in Twitter: Anti-vaccine controversies in times of COVID-19
    Carrasco-Polaino, Rafael
    Martin-Cardaba, Miguel-Angel
    Villar-Cirujano, Ernesto
    COMUNICAR, 2021, 29 (69) : 21 - 31
  • [16] Anti-vaccine attitudes and COVID-19 vaccine status at the end of the US public health emergency
    Choi, Jasmin
    Feelemyer, Jonathan
    Choe, Karen
    Lynch, Kathleen
    Mcknight, Courtney
    Yang, Lawrence H.
    Des Jarlais, Don
    Chang, Virginia W.
    VACCINE, 2025, 55
  • [17] From Facebook to YouTube: The Potential Exposure to COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Videos on Social Media
    Gruzd, Anatoliy
    Abul-Fottouh, Deena
    Song, Melodie YunJu
    Saiphoo, Alyssa
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [18] Information, misinformation, disinformation, and Anti-vaccine movements: materiality of enunciations in information regimes
    Vignoli, Richele Grenge
    Rabello, Rodrigo
    de Almeida, Carlos Candido
    ENCONTROS BIBLI-REVISTA ELETRONICA DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2021, 26
  • [19] The dramatic increase in anti-vaccine discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social network analysis of Twitter
    Durmaz, Nihal
    Hengirmen, Engin
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (01)
  • [20] Don't talk to strangers? The role of network composition, WhatsApp groups, and partisanship in explaining beliefs in misinformation about COVID-19 in Brazil
    Rossini, Patricia
    Kalogeropoulos, Antonis
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2025, 22 (01) : 113 - 130