Clinical Outcomes of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations: A 10-Year Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map

被引:1
|
作者
de Menezes, Anna Julia Oliveira [1 ]
Barbosa, Lucas do Nascimento [1 ]
Leite, Juan Vitor Costa [2 ]
Barbosa, Laryssa Mylenna Madruga [3 ]
Montenegro, Robinsom Viegas [4 ]
Dantas, Raquel Venancio Fernandes [4 ]
de Souza, Grace Mendonca [5 ]
de Andrade, Ana Karina Maciel [4 ]
Lima, Renally Bezerra Wanderley [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Paraiba UFPB, Joao Pessoa, Brazil
[2] State Univ Campinas FOP UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Dent Mat Div, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] State Univ Ponta Grossa UEPG, Dept Restorat Dent, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[4] Fed Univ Paraiba UFPB, Dept Restorat Dent, Joao Pessoa, Brazil
[5] Univ Louisville UofL, Sch Dent, Dept Comprehens Dent, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
Dental marginal adaptation; Dental restoration failure; Operative dentistry; Permanent dental restoration; resin composite; CLASS-II RESTORATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY; POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE; LONGEVITY; STRESS; DEPTH; REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL; CURE;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.13339
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo map the evidence regarding the clinical performance of posterior restorations with bulk-fill resin composites and identify research gaps.Materials and MethodsThis mapping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, and its protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Systematic searches were conducted, considering studies published between 2013 and February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies investigating the performance of bulk-fill resin composite restorations in class I and/or class II preparations with increments of 4 to 5 mm were included.ResultsA total of 147 articles were identified, and based on the eligibility criteria, 26 studies were selected for descriptive analysis. Of the reviewed studies, 73% (n = 19) investigated high-viscosity bulk-fill composites, while 30% (n = 8) focused on low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Evaluation periods ranged from 1 week to 10 years. Reported annual failure rates varied from 0% to 3%, with survival rates between 78.9% and 100%.ConclusionsBulk-fill resin composites of high viscosity were the most analyzed in the published studies, with evaluation periods of up to 10 years. The review of available scientific evidence showed clinically acceptable performance for composite bulk-fill restorations, with high survival rates and minimal annual failure rates. There is a need for long-term clinical studies on bulk-fill resin composites.Clinical SignificanceThis review demonstrates that both high and low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites exhibit satisfactory clinical performance, which can help clinicians optimize chairside time. However, it is important to highlight the need for further studies with longer follow-up periods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations
    Yazici, Ayse Ruya
    Kutuk, Zeynep Bilge
    Ergin, Esra
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (01) : 417 - 426
  • [2] Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Isac Arbildo-Vega, Heber
    Lapinska, Barbara
    Panda, Saurav
    Lamas-Lara, Cesar
    Khan, Abdul Samad
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [3] Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mamede Veloso, Sirley Raiane
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Dantas de Moraes, Sandra Lucia
    do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (01) : 221 - 233
  • [4] The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review
    Sengupta, Arjita
    Naka, Olga
    Mehta, Shamir B.
    Banerji, Subir
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2023, 24 (03) : 143 - 143
  • [5] Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review
    Chesterman, J.
    Jowett, A.
    Gallacher, A.
    Nixon, P.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2017, 222 (05) : 337 - 344
  • [6] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations
    Alves Berti, Luiza Salles
    Turssi, Cecilia Pedroso
    Botelho do Amaral, Flavia Lucisano
    Basting, Roberta Tarkany
    Cintra Junqueira, Jose Luiz
    Panzarella, Francine Kuhl
    Reis, Andre Figueiredo
    Gomes Franca, Fabiana Mantovani
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 33 (04): : 213 - 217
  • [7] Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and a Microhybrid Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities
    Karaarslan, Emine Sirin
    Bal, Fatma Aytac
    Buldur, Mehmet
    Altan, Halenur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 29 (04): : 231 - 240
  • [8] Influence of Matrix Type on Marginal Gap Formation of Deep Class II Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations
    Hahn, Britta
    Haubitz, Imme
    Krug, Ralf
    Krastl, Gabriel
    Soliman, Sebastian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
  • [9] Two-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class II restorations: a randomized clinical trial
    Elawsya, Mohamed Elshirbeny
    Montaser, Marmar Ahmed
    El-Wassefy, Noha Abdel-Mawla
    Zaghloul, Nadia Mohamed
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (02)
  • [10] Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso
    Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos
    Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes
    Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos
    Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
    Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 221 - 233