Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Starch-Jensen, T. [1 ,2 ]
Ahmad, M. [3 ]
Bruun, N. H. [4 ]
Spin-Neto, R. [5 ]
Hellen-Halme, K. [6 ,7 ]
Becktor, J. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Oral Med, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Res Data & Biostat, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Dent & Oral Hlth, Sect Oral Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Malmo, Sweden
[7] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Dent, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Alveolar ridge augmentation; Cone- beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Maxilla; Radiography; Randomized controlled trial; Sinus floor augmentation; LONG-TERM CHANGES; BIO-OSS; BOVINE HYDROXYAPATITE; VOLUMETRIC CHANGES; DIFFERENT RATIOS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HEIGHT CHANGES; ELEVATION; DENSITY; ALLOGRAFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2024.07.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study evaluated radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with (A) autogenous bone, (B) 1:1 autogenous bone and deproteinized porcine bone mineral, or (C) 1:1 autogenous bone and biphasic bone graft material. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to groups A, B, and C (20 in each). CBCT scans were obtained at enrolment, after surgery (T1), after prosthetic rehabilitation (T2), and 1 year after implant loading (T3). Significant decreases in graft volume (3D) and graft height (2D) from T1 to T3 were observed in all groups (P P < 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, graft volume was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C (P P < 0.05), and graft height was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P P < 0.05). Bone density increased significantly from T1 to T2 in all groups (P P < 0.001). However, bone density was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C, at T2 and T3 (P P < 0.05). No significant correlation between graft volume or height and implant protrusion length or residual bone height was found. In conclusion, 1:1 autogenous bone and porcine bone resulted in significantly higher graft volume, height, and bone density when compared with autogenous bone or a 1:1 ratio of autogenous bone and biphasic bone. However the higher graft volume, height, and bone density did not appear to lead to improved outcomes at 1 year of functional loading when compared to the other groups.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 980
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: A one-year single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Ahmad, Marianne
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Becktor, Jonas Peter
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (06) : 652 - 667
  • [2] Endo-sinus bone gain following sinus membrane elevation without graft compared with sinus floor augmentation and a composite graft: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, T.
    Bruun, N. H.
    Spin-Neto, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 53 (04) : 319 - 332
  • [3] Patient's perception of recovery after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Ahmad, Marianne
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Becktor, Jonas Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [4] Patient’s perception of recovery after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Thomas Starch-Jensen
    Marianne Ahmad
    Niels Henrik Bruun
    Jonas Peter Becktor
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [5] Endo-sinus bone gain following osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss Collagen compared with no grafting material: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, T.
    Bruun, N. H.
    Spin-Neto, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (11) : 1205 - 1215
  • [6] Maxillary sinus membrane elevation and coagulum compared with maxillary sinus floor augmentation and a composite graft: A 1-year single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (06) : 1056 - 1068
  • [7] Outcomes following osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss Collagen or no grafting material: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Starch-Jensen, T.
    Bruun, N. H.
    Spin-Neto, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (09) : 988 - 997
  • [8] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Autogenous Bone Versus Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed With 25% Autogenous Bone: A 1-Year Multicenter, Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jue, Anouck
    Pijpe, Justin
    Wolvius, Eppo
    Naenni, Nadja
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Jonker, Brend
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [9] Two Composite Bone Graft Substitutes for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: Histological, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analyses
    Ahmet, Safak
    Gultekin, Bahattin Alper
    Karabuda, Zihni Cuneyt
    Olgac, Vakur
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [10] Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs
    Jensen, Thomas
    Schou, Soren
    Svendsen, Patricia A.
    Forman, Julie Lyng
    Gundersen, Hans Jorgen G.
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    Holmstrup, Palle
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (08) : 902 - 910