Multidimensional Party Polarization in Europe: Cross-Cutting Divides and Effective Dimensionality

被引:1
作者
Koedam, Jelle [1 ]
Binding, Garret [1 ,2 ]
Steenbergen, Marco R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Polit Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ ofBasel, Inst Polit Sci, Basel, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
polarization; dimensionality; political parties; partisanship; Europe; POLITICAL POLARIZATION; SYSTEMS; DEMOCRACY; SPACE; COMPETITION; DYNAMICS; STRUGGLE; VOTERS;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123424000474
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Ideological polarization between political parties is essential for meaningful electoral competition, but at its extreme can strain democratic functioning. Despite a widespread recognition that multiple divides structure contemporary party polarization in Europe, its prevailing conceptualization and measurement remain one-dimensional. To resolve this tension, we introduce a novel, multidimensional approach to party polarization. Our main focus is on whether different ideological divides reinforce or crosscut each other. We calculate the effective dimensionality of a policy space using the correlation matrix of parties' positions, which accounts for how the dimensions interrelate. Using both artificial data and positional estimates from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (1999-2019), we highlight the advantages of our approach and demonstrate that it is better able to capture the relationship between party polarization and mass partisanship. This study has important theoretical, methodological, and empirical implications for our understanding of polarization and democratic representation in a changing political landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe [J].
Adams, James ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Leiter, Debra .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2012, 35 (06) :1272-1294
[2]   Subconstituency Reactions to Elite Depolarization in the Netherlands: An Analysis of the Dutch Public's Policy Beliefs and Partisan Loyalties, 1986-98 [J].
Adams, James ;
De Vries, Catherine E. ;
Leiter, Debra .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 42 :81-105
[3]   Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research [J].
Adcock, R ;
Collier, D .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :529-546
[4]   Complexity in the European party space: Exploring dimensionality with experts [J].
Bakker, Ryan ;
Jolly, Seth ;
Polk, Jonathan .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2012, 13 (02) :219-245
[5]   Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Gelman, Andrew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2008, 114 (02) :408-446
[6]   The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations [J].
Benoit, Kenneth ;
Laver, Michael .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2012, 13 (02) :194-218
[7]   The comparative meaning of political space: a comprehensive modeling approach [J].
Binding, Garret ;
Koedam, Jelle ;
Steenbergen, Marco R. .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2024, 12 (03) :643-651
[8]   Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament? [J].
Bischof, Daniel ;
Wagner, Markus .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) :888-904
[9]  
Bornschier S, 2010, SOC LOGIC POLIT, P1
[10]  
CARMINES EG, 1989, ISSUE EVOLUTION RACE