Entrepreneurial ecosystem typologies for entrepreneurial dynamism: a configurational theorizing

被引:1
作者
Roshan, Ravi [1 ]
Balodi, Krishna Chandra [1 ]
Theodoraki, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Lucknow, Strateg Management Area, Lucknow, India
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, IAE, CERGAM, F-13540 Aix En Provence, France
关键词
Entrepreneurial dynamism; firm birth; growth; and death; entrepreneurial ecosystem; QCA; configurational analysis; Typologies; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS; FIRM FORMATION; REGIONAL-VARIATION; INNOVATION; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; GROWTH; LEVEL; SPILLOVERS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/08985626.2025.2475898
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A nation's entrepreneurial dynamism (ED) influences economic progress, national development, and overall societal well-being through its three key dimensions: enterprise birth, growth, and death. Recent developments in the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) literature recognize the interconnected and interdependent nature of various components of the EE. The interconnectedness among elements of the EE suggests the possibility of causal complexity characterized by conjunctural causations, causal asymmetry, and the equifinality of outcomes. Given the dynamic interconnectedness of EE elements and the associated casual complexity, we employ configurational theorizing to explore the configurations of EE elements leading to high levels of ED. Using a panel dataset of 23 countries from 2010 to 2019, we form three typologies for a high enterprise birth rate and four for a high enterprise growth rate. Our findings indicate that some EE elements play a primary role, while others are supportive in driving high enterprise birth and growth rates. Results also suggest that some countries exhibit a temporal configuration change, leading to a high enterprise birth rate. The configurational transition path analysis reveals the importance of including or excluding certain EE elements facilitating countries' transition across high birth, high growth, and high death configurations. We also obtain the configurations of 'productive entrepreneurship' and 'non-productive entrepreneurship'.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Acs ZJ., 1990, Innovation and small firms
[2]   Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Estrin, Saul ;
Mickiewicz, Tomasz ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2018, 51 (02) :501-514
[3]   National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Autio, Erkko ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (03) :476-494
[4]   The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2013, 41 (04) :757-774
[5]   Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society [J].
Ahlstrom, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (03) :11-24
[6]   A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda [J].
Alvedalen, Janna ;
Boschma, Ron .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (06) :887-903
[7]   Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice [J].
Anderson, Alistair R. ;
Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou ;
Jack, Sarah L. .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (05) :958-971
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, FREE MARKET INNOVATI
[9]   Regional inequality in multidimensional quality of employment: insights from Chile, 1996-2017 [J].
Apablaza, Mauricio ;
Sehnbruch, Kirsten ;
Gonzalez, Pablo ;
Mendez, Rocio .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (03) :416-433
[10]   The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation [J].
Armington, C ;
Acs, ZJ .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (01) :33-45