Narrative review: evolution in device technology and advances in surgical techniques on AMS 800 device in the last 50 years

被引:0
作者
Chung, Eric [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Urol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Sydney, Australia
[3] AndroUrol Ctr, Suite 3,530 Boundary St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS); stress incontinence; surgical techniques; technology advances; ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; MALE STRESS; INCONTINENCE; IMPLANTATION; WOMEN; EXPERIENCE; MEN; PLACEMENT; REVISION;
D O I
10.21037/tau-23-10
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: The current AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) device is designed to simulate the function of the biological urinary sphincter to prevent urinary flow through mucosal coaptation, compression, and pressure transmission. The challenges in designing the AMS 800 device involve not only the mechanical operation of the artificial sphincter device but also producing a device that is effective, safe, and durable for patients in the long term. The following article provides a narrative review regarding the evolution and development of the AMS 800 devices over the years and evaluates the advances in surgical techniques relating to AMS 800 implantation. Methods: Available literature pertaining to the AMS 800 device was reviewed from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022. Emphasis is placed on key scientific publications including previous reviews and clinical guidelines relevant to AMS 800 device(s) and surgical techniques. Key Content and Findings: From the engineering point of view, the current AMS 800 device is ingenious and has stood the test of time. The basic design of this modern AUS consists of 3 separate components namely a pressure regulating balloon (PRB), an inflatable cuff, and a control pump. Continued innovations in device design and technology, coupled with refinements in surgical techniques over the past 5 decades have ensured that the AMS 800 device is and remains the standard of care in male stress urinary incontinence. While the long-term AMS 800 efficacy, safety, and durability are well documented, it is not without its limitations and complications. Mechanical and non-mechanical complications can occur especially in high-risk populations (such as in radiated patients) despite strict adherence to surgical principles and manufacturer's guidelines. Conclusions: Continued innovations in device design, technology, and surgical techniques have ensured that the AMS 800 device is an effective and safe treatment for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Future directions in the treatment of male SUI likely reside in cellular regenerative therapy and nanotechnology to restore, replace, or simulate the damaged native urinary sphincter.
引用
收藏
页码:1657 / 1665
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [31] A comparison of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter between cases with and without an underlying neurogenic aetiology
    Murphy, S
    Rea, D
    O'Mahony, J
    McDermott, TED
    Thornhill, J
    Butler, M
    Grainger, R
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 172 (03) : 136 - 138
  • [32] Comparison of outcomes after single or double-cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion
    O'Connor, RC
    Gerber, GS
    Avila, D
    Chen, AA
    Bales, GT
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (04) : 723 - 726
  • [33] An anatomical pathogenesis of lower urinary tract definitions from the 2002 ICS report symptoms, conditions, syndromes, urodynamics
    Petros, Peter
    Quaghebeur, Jorgen
    Wyndaele, Jean-Jacques
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2022, 41 (03) : 740 - 755
  • [34] AMS-800 Artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    O'Connor, Eabhann
    Khavari, Rose
    Capon, Gregoire
    Manunta, Andrea
    Allue, Marta
    Hascoet, Juliette
    Nitti, Victor W.
    Game, Xavier
    Gilleran, Jason
    Castro-Sader, Luis
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Waltregny, David
    Ahyai, Sascha
    Chung, Eric
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    Fournier, Georges
    Brucker, Benjamin M.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 : S28 - S41
  • [35] Robot-assisted AMS-800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter Bladder Neck Implantation in Female Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Capon, Gregoire
    Belas, Olivier
    Manunta, Andrea
    Allenet, Clement
    Hascoet, Juliette
    Calves, Jehanne
    Belas, Michel
    Callerot, Pierre
    Robert, Gregoire
    Descazeaud, Aurelien
    Fournier, Georges
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (01) : 169 - 175
  • [36] Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence: preliminary comparison of robot-assisted and open approaches
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Vincendeau, Sebastien
    Tondut, Lauranne
    Bensalah, Karim
    Damphousse, Mireille
    Manunta, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (03) : 475 - 481
  • [37] Performance and Safety of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AMS 800) for Non-neurogenic Women with Urinary Incontinence Secondary to Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency: A Systematic Review
    Reus, Christine R.
    Phe, Veronique
    Dechartres, Agnes
    Grilo, Nuno R.
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel J.
    Mozer, Pierre C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 327 - 338
  • [38] Rigetti, About us
  • [39] Laparoscopic Approach for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Women with Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency Incontinence: A Single-Centre Preliminary Experience
    Roupret, Morgan
    Misrai, Vincent
    Vaessen, Christophe
    Cardot, Vincent
    Cour, Florence
    Richard, Francois
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) : 499 - 504
  • [40] 14 years of experience with the artificial urinary sphincter in children and adolescents without spina bifida
    Ruiz, E.
    Puigdevall, J.
    Moldes, J.
    Lobos, P.
    Boer, M.
    Ithurralde, J.
    Escalante, J.
    de Badiola, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (04) : 1821 - 1825