Influencing factors of a holistic diagnostic to promote work ability. A focus group study

被引:0
|
作者
Roder, Jessica [1 ]
Fauser, David [1 ]
Lemke, Stella [1 ]
Doetsch, Saskia [2 ]
Kindel, Claudia [3 ]
Kleineke, Vera [4 ]
Bethge, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Inst Sozial Med & Epidemiol, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Rehazentrum Nat Pk Aukrug, Aukrug, Germany
[3] Rostocker Zentrum Ambulante Rehabil, Rostock, Germany
[4] Deutsch Rentenversicherung Nord, Lubeck, Germany
来源
PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG | 2025年
关键词
Earning capacity; Holistic clarification; Interdisciplinary cooperation; Implementation; Occupational health physicians; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH PHYSICIANS; REHABILITATION; COOPERATION; EMPLOYEES; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11553-025-01198-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe rehapro-pilot project GIBI (Ganzheitliche Kl & auml;rung des Interventionsbedarfs bei gef & auml;hrdeter beruflicher Integration; funding: Bundesministerium f & uuml;r Arbeit und Soziales) is a holistic approach to assess health-related work restrictions and combines rehabilitative medical and occupational health expertise. The aim of this study is to supplement data of the observational study by identifying factors that promote and hinder the implementation of the intervention or cooperation with occupational physicians. MethodsThe observational study, which is followed by the focus group study, is registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS00024522). For data collection, three guided online focus groups were conducted with study coordinators responsible for GIBI, medical professionals, and therapeutic staff of the participating rehabilitation facilities. The data were anonymized, transcribed, and evaluated according to the principles of qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Categories were formed inductively. ResultsData from three focus groups with a total of 13 people were considered for analysis (Aukrug: n = 5; Hamburg: n = 4; Rostock: n = 4). In the focus groups, the interdisciplinary approach and early availability were identified as facilitating factors, while a high implementation effort and a lack of trust in occupational physicians as well as a shortage of time resources were identified as hindering factors in the implementation of the intervention. The transmission of final reports to occupational physicians was also identified as a facilitating factor for cooperation with occupational physicians, while difficulties in establishing personal contact and the shortage of time resources of occupational physicians were identified as hindering factors for cooperation. ConclusionInterdisciplinary cooperation in the diagnostic process and organizational issues, such as the exchange of reports between the rehabilitation center and occupational physicians, should be guaranteed to ensure successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing speech pathology practice in dysphagia after stroke: A qualitative focus group study
    Choy, Jacinda
    Pourkazemi, Fereshteh
    Bogaardt, Hans
    Anderson, Caitlin
    Chai, Shing Yee
    Pebdani, Roxanna N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2024, 59 (04) : 1599 - 1611
  • [2] How do physiotherapists perceive their role in work ability assessments? A prospective focus group study
    Stigmar, Kjerstin
    Ekdahl, Charlottle
    Borgquist, Lars
    Grahn, Birgitta
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 15 (03) : 268 - 276
  • [3] Experiences of factors contributing to women's ability to make informed decisions about the process of rehabilitation and return to work: A focus group study
    Martensson, Lena
    Hensing, Gunnel
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 43 (02): : 237 - 248
  • [4] Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program - a focus group study
    Svanholm, Frida
    Liedberg, Gunilla Margareta
    Lofgren, Monika
    Bjork, Mathilda
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (05) : 736 - 744
  • [5] How do Dutch GPs address work-related problems? A focus group study
    de Kock, Cornelis A.
    Lucassen, Peter L. B. J.
    Spinnewijn, Laura
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Buijs, Peter C.
    Steenbeek, Romy
    Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [6] Factors influencing the development of end-of-life communication skills: A focus group study of nursing and medical students
    Gillett, Karen
    O'Neill, Bernadette
    Bloomfield, Jacqueline G.
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 36 : 395 - 400
  • [7] In the hands of nurses: A focus group study of how nurses perceive and promote inpatients' needs for physical activity
    Ohlsson-Nevo, Emma
    Andersson, Gunnel
    Strid, Emma Nilsing
    NURSING OPEN, 2020, 7 (01): : 334 - 344
  • [8] Stroke self-management: A focus group study to identify the factors influencing self-management following stroke
    Boger, Emma J.
    Demain, Sara H.
    Latter, Sue M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (01) : 175 - 187
  • [9] "Stay Healthy at Work". A Pilot Study of a Group Therapy Intervention to Regain Ability to Work
    Wittmann, Linus
    Hampel, Petra
    Peter, Ulrike
    Karow, Anne
    Gallinat, Juergen
    Groen, Gunter
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2019, 48 (02): : 105 - 113
  • [10] Perspectives of People with a Chronic Disease on Participating in Work: A Focus Group Study
    Vooijs, Marloes
    Leensen, Monique C. J.
    Hoving, Jan L.
    Wind, Haije
    Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 27 (04) : 593 - 600