共 50 条
Validation of a Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool Among Patients Hospitalized Due to Heart Failure
被引:0
|作者:
Hamatani, Yasuhiro
[1
]
Teramoto, Kanako
[2
]
Ikeyama-hideshima, Yurika
[3
]
Ogata, Soshiro
[4
]
Kunugida, Atsuko
[3
]
Ishigami, Kenjiro
[1
]
Minami, Kimihito
[1
]
Yamaguchi, Maki
[3
]
Takamoto, Mina
[5
]
Nakashima, Jun
[6
]
Yamaguchi, Mitsuyo
[3
]
Sakai, Misaki
[7
]
Kinoshita, Tae
[7
]
Iguchi, Moritake
[1
,5
]
Nishimura, Kunihiro
[2
,4
]
Akao, Masaharu
[1
]
机构:
[1] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, 1-1 Mukaihata cho,Fushimi ku, Kyoto 6128555, Japan
[2] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Suita, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Nursing, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med & Epidemiol, Suita, Japan
[5] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil, Kyoto, Japan
[6] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Palliat Care Med, Kyoto, Japan
关键词:
Heart failure;
palliative care;
supportive and palliative care indicator tool;
RISK SCORE;
IDENTIFICATION;
ASSOCIATION;
MORTALITY;
NEEDS;
SPICT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.016
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Palliative care, including symptom alleviation and advance-care planning, is relevant for patients with heart failure (HF). The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool (SPICT) is a tool for identifying patients who may benefit from palliative-care assistance but has not been validated in patients hospitalized due to HF. Methods and Results: Clinical backgrounds, symptom burdens and outcomes were evaluated using the SPICT as assessed on admission in consecutive hospitalized patients with HF. SPICT-positive was defined when 2 or more general indicators and a New York Heart Association class >_ III were present. Of 601 patients hospitalized due to HF (mean age: 79 f 12 years; male, 314 [52%]; and mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 44 f 18%), 100 (17%) patients were SPICT-positive. SPICT-positive patients were older (85 f 9 vs 78 f 12 years; P < 0.001) and had higher clinical frailty scales (6 f 1 vs 4 f 1 points; P < 0.001), whereas symptom burdens assessed by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale were not different (17 [13, 28] vs 20 [11, 26] points; P = 0.97) when compared with patients who were SPICT-negative. During the median follow-up period of 518 days, 178 patients (30%) died. Being SPICT-positive was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.49, 95% confidence interval: 2.41-5.05; P < 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association class IV, Get-With-The-Guideline risk score, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and left ventricular ejection fractions. Conclusions: In patients admitted for HF, being SPICT-positive was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality rates, suggesting the utility of the SPICT as an indicator to initiate advance-care planning for end-of-life care among patients hospitalized due to HF. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 25
页数:10
相关论文