Machine learning-based Bayesian optimization facilitates ultrafiltration process design for efficient protein purification

被引:0
作者
Lu, Qinglin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hao [1 ]
Fan, Rong [1 ]
Wan, Yinhua [1 ,4 ]
Luo, Jianquan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Proc Engn, State Key Lab Biopharmaceut Preparat & Delivery, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Adv Interdisciplinary Sci, Beijing 101408, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Chem Engn, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Ganjiang Innovat Acad, Ganzhou 341119, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ultrafiltration; Protein purification; Machine learning; Bayesian optimization; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132122
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The ultrafiltration (UF) process, known for its mild and efficient separation capabilities, is widely utilized for protein drug purification, concentration, and buffer exchange. However, conventional UF process design and optimization require significant labor, time, and protein consumption due to the complexity of multivariate influencing factors. In this study, machine learning (ML)-based Bayesian optimization was employed to recommend tailored membrane types and operational conditions based on feed solution properties and filtration objectives. Among six trained ML models, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving coefficients of determination (R-2) of 0.93, 0.90, and 0.98 for rejection rate, steady flux, and permeance variations, respectively, on test datasets. Key parameters, including transmembrane pressure (TMP), protein concentration, pH, and membrane pore size, were identified as dominant factors influencing UF performance. Dynamic feature importance analysis revealed stage-specific variations in critical features affecting permeance, enabling precise process adjustments. Experimental validation confirmed the model's accuracy in predicting rejection rates and permeance variations. Finally, Bayesian optimization was applied to identify optimal operational parameters, achieving a steady flux closely aligned with predicted values (error < 0.5 %) and significantly outperforming other conditions. The ML models developed in this work offer a powerful approach for designing and optimizing UF processes with reduced research and development costs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Chauhan V.M., Zhang H., Dalby P.A., Aylott J.W., Advancements in the co-formulation of biologic therapeutics, J. Control. Release, 327, pp. 397-405, (2020)
  • [2] Su J., Wu S., Zhou F., Tong Z., Research Progress of Macromolecules in the Prevention and Treatment of Sepsis, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24, (2023)
  • [3] Lagasse H.A., Alexaki A., Simhadri V.L., Katagiri N.H., Jankowski W., Sauna Z.E., Kimchi-Sarfaty C., Recent Advances in (therapeutic Protein) Drug Development, 6, (2017)
  • [4] Vicente F.A., Plazl I., Ventura S.P.M., Znidarsic-Plazl P., Separation and purification of biomacromolecules based on microfluidics, Green Chem., 22, pp. 4391-4410, (2020)
  • [5] Nadar S., Shooter G., Somasundaram B., Shave E., Baker K., Lua L.H.L., Intensified Downstream Processing of Monoclonal Antibodies Using Membrane Technology, Biotechnol. J., 16, (2021)
  • [6] Zhang H., Luo J., Li S., Woodley J.M., Wan Y., Can graphene oxide improve the performance of biocatalytic membrane?, Chem. Eng. J., 359, pp. 982-993, (2019)
  • [7] Mondal M., Indurkar P.D., Heavy metals remediation using MOF5@GO composite incorporated mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane, Chem. Eng. J., 494, (2024)
  • [8] Teeters M., Bezila D., Benner T., Alfonso P., Alred P., Predicting diafiltration solution compositions for final ultrafiltration/diafiltration steps of monoclonal antibodies, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 108, pp. 1338-1346, (2011)
  • [9] Afzal M.A., Zydney A.L., Impact of proteins and protein fouling on virus retention during virus removal filtration, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 121, pp. 710-718, (2023)
  • [10] Jabra M.G., Zydney A.L., Design and optimization of Single Pass Tangential Flow Filtration for inline concentration of monoclonal antibodies, J. Membr. Sci., 643, (2022)