Integrating machine learning for multi-objective optimization of biomass conversion to hydrogen

被引:1
作者
Li, Yinchen [1 ]
Jiang, Peng [1 ]
Li, Lin [1 ]
Ji, Tuo [1 ]
Mu, Liwen [1 ]
Lu, Xiaohua [1 ]
Zhu, Jiahua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Chem Engn, State Key Lab Mat Oriented Chem Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass to H 2 process; Calcium looping reforming; Mechanism-guided modelling; Machine learning; Multi-objective optimization; STEAM GASIFICATION; POTENTIAL USE; BIOCHAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144948
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The biomass-to-H2 (BTH) process is considered an important source of green H2, but the involvement of various biomass species and complex operating parameters poses significant challenges in practical operation and optimization. Herein, Aspen Plus was employed for data augmentation along with machine learning (ML) models to establish a hybrid ML model, which achieved an average R2 greater than 0.999 and an average RMSE of 0.322 in predicting BTH outputs. Furthermore, integrating the hybrid ML model with the economic-environmental evaluation program enabled multi-objective optimization of the BTH process. Results revealed that the lowest cost achieved was 1.13 USD/kgH2 with corresponding carbon emissions of 4.12-4.63 kgCO2e/kgH2. However, there was a tradeoff between cost and carbon emissions. By controlling the H2 yield within the G3 range (200-300 kg/h), a low cost of 1.32 USD/kgH2 and low carbon emissions of -0.23 kgCO2e/kgH2 were simultaneously achieved. Overall, this work proposed a new strategy for multi-objective optimization in H2 production, coupling the hybrid ML model-driven accuracy prediction with an interactive platform.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Countercurrent chemical looping for enhanced methane reforming with complete conversion and inherent CO2 separation [J].
Bulfin, B. ;
Zuber, M. ;
Steinfeld, A. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 488
[2]   Production and characterization of bio-chars from biomass via pyrolysis [J].
Demirbas, A .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2006, 28 (05) :413-422
[3]   Deep learning models in Python']Python for predicting hydrogen production: A comparative study [J].
Devasahayam, Sheila .
ENERGY, 2023, 280
[4]  
Elgowainy A., 2015, Arlington: Annual merit review and peer evaluation report, P8
[5]   Industrial-scale bioethanol production from brown algae: Effects of pretreatment processes on plant economics [J].
Fasahati, Peyman ;
Woo, Hee Chul ;
Liu, J. Jay .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 139 :175-187
[6]  
Field C., 2003, Global Carbon Project
[7]  
Group C.C.G.G.W, 2022, China Products Carbon Footprint Factors Database
[8]   Multi-objective optimization of CO2 emission and thermal efficiency for on-site steam methane reforming hydrogen production process using machine learning [J].
Hong, Seokyoung ;
Lee, Jaewon ;
Cho, Hyungtae ;
Kim, Minsu ;
Moon, Il ;
Kim, Junghwan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 359
[9]   Chemical looping gasification of biomass with Fe2O3/CaO as the oxygen carrier for hydrogen-enriched syngas production [J].
Hu, Qiang ;
Shen, Ye ;
Chew, Jia Wei ;
Ge, Tianshu ;
Wang, Chi-Hwa .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 379
[10]  
IEA, 2021, Net Zero by 2050-Analysis-IEA, DOI [10.1787/c8328405-en, DOI 10.1787/C8328405-EN]