Can heterogeneous environmental policies mitigate ESG divergence? -Based on corporate green innovation and bleaching green behavioral options

被引:5
作者
Li, Shuangyuan [1 ]
Xu, Xiaoli [1 ]
Zhu, Fuxian [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Urumqi, Peoples R China
关键词
Heterogeneity; Environmental regulation; ESG divergence; Corporate green technology innovation; corporate greenwashing behavior;
D O I
10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100351
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
ESG divergence weakens capital market allocation efficiency, and whether environmental policies can reduce ESG rating divergence by guiding corporate green behavior is a topic of concern. This study examines the effects and mechanisms of diverse environmental legislation on corporate ESG divergence using a sample of Chinese Ashare listed businesses from 2016 to 2023. (1) Punitive environmental policies make corporate ESG ratings more divergent, whereas incentive-based policies have the opposite effect; (2) Punitive environmental policies exacerbate disagreements by "forcing" firms to engage in green technological innovation, while incentive-based environmental policies mitigate disagreements by "motivating" firms to engage in greenwashing behavior; (3) Innovatively, the study concludes that the distorting effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on corporate ESG divergence are mitigated and corrected in an environment with strong green financing and efficient government oversight. According to this paper's conclusions, environmental protection agencies should strengthen the coherence of their policy direction and collaborate to create a powerful force in the formulation of public policy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty [J].
Avramov, Doron ;
Cheng, Si ;
Lioui, Abraham ;
Tarelli, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 145 (02) :642-664
[2]   Meeting medical challenges in a changing world: The international program of the US Army Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC) [J].
Belard, J. -Louis .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2006, 12 (04) :426-431
[3]  
Bidatian Huang Weixin, 2024, Sci. Res., V42, P594, DOI [10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230404.002, DOI 10.16192/J.CNKI.1003-2053.20230404.002]
[4]   Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers [J].
Chatterji, Aaron K. ;
Durand, Rodolphe ;
Levine, David I. ;
Touboul, Samuel .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (08) :1597-1614
[5]  
Chen L.F., 2023, Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), V53, P42
[6]   Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China [J].
Chen, Zhao ;
Liu, Zhikuo ;
Serrato, Juan Carlos Suarez ;
Xu, Daniel Yi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (07) :2065-2100
[7]   Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings [J].
Christensen, Dane M. ;
Serafeim, George ;
Sikochi, Anywhere .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 97 (01) :147-175
[8]  
Cui Zhaozai, 2023, Res. Manage., V44, P140, DOI [10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2023.05.015, DOI 10.19571/J.CNKI.1000-2995.2023.05.015]
[9]  
Ding X., 2019, The Impact of Environmental Administrative Penalties on the Disclosure of Environmental Information, DOI [10.3390/su11205820, DOI 10.3390/SU11205820]
[10]   How the Market Values Greenwashing? Evidence from China [J].
Du, Xingqiang .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 128 (03) :547-574