Transition in action: toward a social theory of the governance of transitions

被引:0
|
作者
Billi, Marco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zurbriggen, Cristina [4 ,5 ]
Urquiza, Anahi [1 ,6 ]
Allendes, Angel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Ctr Climate & Resilience Res, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Fac Agr Sci, Santiago, Chile
[3] Syst Transdisciplinary Res Hub NEST R3, Santiago, Chile
[4] South Amer Inst Resilience & Sustainabil Studies S, Maldonado, Uruguay
[5] Univ Republica, Fac Social Sci, Montevideo, Uruguay
[6] Univ Chile, Fac Social Sci, Santiago, Chile
关键词
sustainable transition; Luhmann; socio-technical approach; socio-ecological approach; co-construction methodologies; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; META-GOVERNANCE; RESILIENCE; EMERGENCE; TYPOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFORMATION; DYNAMICS; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fsoc.2024.1206050
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article explores how a re-interpretation of the socio-technical, socio-ecological and transition design approaches to transition from the point of view of Niklas Luhmann's general systems theory of society. The need to understand and promote changes that include a technological and ecological dimension has led to different approaches, such as socio-technical or socio-environmental approaches, to incorporate links with society. While these approaches often include sociological insights, they rarely offer a general understanding of how these are embedded into society. We need a new environmental sociology that helps catalyze change processes with a collectively reorganized society, empowering more radically transformative actions to change the current structures and processes that have led us to where we are today. The article offers a cross-sectional look at the socio-ecological and socio-technical systems literature, specifically for what concerns their understanding of the 'systems' in transition and how they can be governed, and re-interpret it from the theoretical lens of the deep sociological knowledge, which refers to the profound understanding of social systems and their dynamics, embedded in Luhmann's theory of social systems. From here, we suggest the second-order coupling for a sociologically grounded understanding of the interactions that comprise socio-ecological and socio-technical systems, heterogeneous and almost self-organizing assemblies of social, technical, and natural elements and processes. At the same time, third-order couplings are analyzed, focused on governance, relationships between operations, and structures mediated by a deliberate attempt to ensure coherence and coordination against the autonomy and heterogeneity of socio-techno-ecological systems. Therefore, this manuscript offers a deeper conceptual and methodological understanding of socio-techno-ecological couplings and systems in the context of sustainability transformation and gives insights into its governance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toward understanding the governance of varietal and genetic diversity
    Gerullis, Maria K.
    Heckelei, Thomas
    Rasch, Sebastian
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (02):
  • [22] Contemporary Challenges in Environmental Governance: Technology, governance and the social licence
    Cullen-Knox, Coco
    Eccleston, Richard
    Haward, Marcus
    Lester, Elizabeth
    Vince, Joanna
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [23] Toward the adaptive governance of transboundary water resources
    Akamani, Kofi
    Wilson, Patrick Impero
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (06): : 409 - 416
  • [24] Developing an integrated model of Islamic social finance: toward an effective governance framework
    Widiastuti, Tika
    Ningsih, Sri
    Prasetyo, Ari
    Mawardi, Imron
    Herianingrum, Sri
    Robani, Anidah
    Al Mustofa, Muhammad Ubaidillah
    Hady, Aufar Fadlul
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (09)
  • [25] What's underneath? Social skills throughout sustainability transitions
    Fohim, Emamdeen
    Jolly, Suyash
    ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 40 : 348 - 366
  • [26] A theory-based approach to evaluations intended to inform transitions toward sustainability
    Mickwitz, Per
    Neij, Lena
    Johansson, Maria
    Benner, Mats
    Sandin, Sofie
    EVALUATION, 2021, 27 (03) : 281 - 306
  • [27] Identifying opportunities to improve governance of aquatic agricultural systems through participatory action research
    Apgar, J. Marina
    Cohen, Philippa J.
    Ratner, Blake D.
    de Silva, Sanjiv
    Buisson, Marie-Charlotte
    Longley, Catherine
    Bastakoti, Ram C.
    Mapedza, Everisto
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (01):
  • [28] Bet on innovation, not Environmental, Social and Governance metrics, to lead the Net Zero transition
    Madden, Bartley J.
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2023, 40 (03) : 417 - 428
  • [29] Social Innovation, Circularity and Energy Transition for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices-A Comprehensive Review
    Popescu, Catalin
    Hysa, Eglantina
    Kruja, Alba
    Mansi, Egla
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [30] Social innovations in the German energy transition: an attempt to use the heuristics of the multi-level perspective of transitions to analyze the diffusion process of social innovations
    Hoelsgens, Rick
    Luebke, Stephanie
    Hasselkuss, Marco
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 8