Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements

被引:13
作者
Giare, William [1 ]
Najafi, Mahdi [2 ,3 ]
Pan, Supriya [4 ,5 ]
Di Valentino, Eleonora [1 ]
Firouzjaee, Javad T. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Math & Stat, Hounsfield Rd, Sheffield S3 7RH, England
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Phys, POB 15875-4416, Tehran, Iran
[3] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Phys, PDAT Lab, POB 15875-4416, Tehran, Iran
[4] Presidency Univ, Dept Math, 86-1 Coll St, Kolkata 700073, India
[5] Durban Univ Technol, Inst Syst Sci, POB 1334, ZA-4000 Durban, South Africa
[6] Inst Res Fundamental Sci IPM, Sch Phys, POB 19395-5531, Tehran, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | 2024年 / 10期
基金
英国科学技术设施理事会;
关键词
baryon acoustic oscillations; dark energy theory; COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT PROBLEM; EQUATION-OF-STATE; OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS; ACCELERATING UNIVERSE; INHOMOGENEOUS FLUIDS; COSMIC ACCELERATION; OSCILLATING QUINTOM; GENERAL-RELATIVITY; AVERAGE PROPERTIES; SUPERNOVA;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Recent Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements released by DESI, when combined with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from Planck and two different samples of Type Ia supernovae (Pantheon-Plus and DESY5) reveal a preference for Dynamical Dark Energy (DDE) characterized by a present-day quintessence-like equation of state that crossed into the phantom regime in the past. A core ansatz for this result is assuming a linear Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization w(a) = w 0 + wa(1 a (1 - a) to describe the evolution of the DE equation of state (EoS). In this paper, we test if and to what extent this assumption impacts the results. To prevent broadening uncertainties in cosmological parameter inference and facilitate direct comparison with the baseline CPL case, we focus on 4 alternative well-known models that, just like CPL, consist of only two free parameters: the present-day DE EoS (w0) w 0 ) and a parameter quantifying its dynamical evolution (wa). w a ). We demonstrate that the preference for DDE remains robust regardless of the parameterization: w 0 consistently remains in the quintessence regime, while w a consistently indicates a preference for a dynamical evolution towards the phantom regime. This tendency is significantly strengthened by DESY5 SN measurements. By comparing the best-fit chi 2 obtained within each DDE model, we notice that the linear CPL parameterization is not the best-fitting case. Among the models considered, the EoS proposed by Barboza and Alcaniz consistently leads to the most significant improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 397 条
  • [1] The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
    Abbott, T.
    Abdalla, F. B.
    Aleksic, J.
    Allam, S.
    Amara, A.
    Bacon, D.
    Balbinot, E.
    Banerji, M.
    Bechtol, K.
    Benoit-Levy, A.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Bertin, E.
    Blazek, J.
    Bonnett, C.
    Bridle, S.
    Brooks, D.
    Brunner, R. J.
    Buckley-Geer, E.
    Burke, D. L.
    Caminha, G. B.
    Capozzi, D.
    Carlsen, J.
    Carnero-Rosell, A.
    Carollo, M.
    Carrasco-Kind, M.
    Carretero, J.
    Castander, F. J.
    Clerkin, L.
    Collett, T.
    Conselice, C.
    Crocce, M.
    Cunha, C. E.
    D'Andrea, C. B.
    da Costa, L. N.
    Davis, T. M.
    Desai, S.
    Diehl, H. T.
    Dietrich, J. P.
    Dodelson, S.
    Doel, P.
    Drlica-Wagner, A.
    Estrada, J.
    Etherington, J.
    Evrard, A. E.
    Fabbri, J.
    Finley, D. A.
    Flaugher, B.
    Foley, R. J.
    Fosalba, P.
    Frieman, J.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 460 (02) : 1270 - 1299
  • [2] Abbott TMC, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2401.02929
  • [3] Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Constraints on extensions to ΛCDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering
    Abbott, T. M. C.
    Aguena, M.
    Alarcon, A.
    Alves, O.
    Amon, A.
    Andrade-Oliveira, F.
    Annis, J.
    Avila, S.
    Bacon, D.
    Baxter, E.
    Bechtol, K.
    Becker, M. R.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Birrer, S.
    Blazek, J.
    Bocquet, S.
    Brandao-Souza, A.
    Bridle, S. L.
    Brooks, D.
    Burke, D. L.
    Camacho, H.
    Campos, A.
    Rosell, A. Carnero
    Kind, M. Carrasco
    Carretero, J.
    Castander, F. J.
    Cawthon, R.
    Chang, C.
    Chen, A.
    Chen, R.
    Choi, A.
    Conselice, C.
    Cordero, J.
    Costanzi, M.
    Crocce, M.
    da Costa, L. N.
    Pereira, M. E. S.
    Davis, C.
    Davis, T. M.
    DeRose, J.
    Desai, S.
    Di Valentino, E.
    Diehl, H. T.
    Dodelson, S.
    Doel, P.
    Doux, C.
    Drlica-Wagner, A.
    Eckert, K.
    Eifler, T. F.
    Elsner, F.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (08)
  • [4] Abbott T. M. C., 2022, arXiv: 2105.13549 astro-ph.CO, V105, DOI 10.1103/ PhysRevD.105.023520
  • [5] Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies
    Abdalla, Elcio
    Abellan, Guillermo Franco
    Aboubrahim, Amin
    Agnello, Adriano
    Akarsu, Ozgur
    Akrami, Yashar
    Alestas, George
    Aloni, Daniel
    Amendola, Luca
    Anchordoqui, Luis A.
    Anderson, Richard I.
    Arendse, Nikki
    Asgari, Marika
    Ballardini, Mario
    Bargerx, Vernon
    Basilakos, Spyros
    Batista, Ronaldo C.
    Battistelli, Elia S.
    Battye, Richard
    Benetti, Micol
    Benisty, David
    Berlin, Asher
    de Bernardis, Paolo
    Berti, Emanuele
    Bidenko, Bohdan
    Birrer, Simon
    Blakeslee, John P.
    Boddy, Kimberly K.
    Bom, Clecio R.
    Bonilla, Alexander
    Borghi, Nicola
    Bouchet, Francois R.
    Braglia, Matteo
    Buchert, Thomas
    Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth
    Calabrese, Erminia
    Caldwell, Robert R.
    Camarena, David
    Capozziello, Salvatore
    Casertano, Stefano
    Chen, Angela
    Chen, Geoff C-F
    Chen, Hsin-Yu
    Chluba, Jens
    Chudaykin, Anton
    Cicoli, Michele
    Copi, Craig J.
    Courbin, Fred
    Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan
    Czerny, Bozena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY ASTROPHYSICS, 2022, 34 : 49 - 211
  • [6] Adame A. G, arXiv
  • [7] Omnipotent dark energy: A phenomenological answer to the Hubble tension
    Adil, Shahnawaz A.
    Akarsu, Ozguer
    Di Valentino, Eleonora
    Nunes, Rafael C.
    Ozulker, Emre
    Sen, Anjan A.
    Specogna, Enrico
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (02)
  • [8] Dark energy in light of the early JWST observations: case for a negative cosmological constant?
    Adil, Shahnawaz A.
    Mukhopadhyay, Upala
    Sen, Anjan A.
    Vagnozzi, Sunny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2023, (10):
  • [9] Fitting the DESI BAO data with dark energy driven by the Cohen-Kaplan-Nelson bound
    Adolf, Patrick
    Hirsch, Martin
    Krieg, Sara
    Paes, Heinrich
    Tabet, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2024, (08):
  • [10] Planck 2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
    Aghanim, N.
    Akrami, Y.
    Arroja, F.
    Ashdown, M.
    Aumont, J.
    Baccigalupi, C.
    Ballardini, M.
    Banday, A. J.
    Barreiro, R. B.
    Bartolo, N.
    Basak, S.
    Battye, R.
    Benabed, K.
    Bernard, J. -P.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Bielewicz, P.
    Bock, J. J.
    Bond, J. R.
    Borrill, J.
    Bouchet, F. R.
    Boulanger, F.
    Bucher, M.
    Burigana, C.
    Butler, R. C.
    Calabrese, E.
    Cardoso, J. -F.
    Carron, J.
    Casaponsa, B.
    Challinor, A.
    Chiang, H. C.
    Colombo, L. P. L.
    Combet, C.
    Contreras, D.
    Crill, B. P.
    Cuttaia, F.
    de Bernardis, P.
    de Zotti, G.
    Delabrouille, J.
    Delouis, J. -M.
    Desert, F. -X.
    Di Valentino, E.
    Dickinson, C.
    Diego, J. M.
    Donzelli, S.
    Dore, O.
    Douspis, M.
    Ducout, A.
    Dupac, X.
    Efstathiou, G.
    Elsner, F.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2020, 641