Economic Feasibility of Hydrogen Generation Using HTR-PM Technology in Saudi Arabia

被引:0
作者
Al-Shikh, Saud A. [1 ,2 ]
Al-Ammar, Essam A. [1 ,3 ]
Alomari, Abdullah S. [4 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, MS Nucl Engn Program, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdullah City Atom & Renewable Energy KACARE, POB 2022, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdulaziz City Sci & Technol KACST, Nucl Technol Inst, POB 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
关键词
hydrogen production sustainability; pebble bed modular reactor (PBMR); high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR); high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE); sulfur-iodine (SI) thermochemical cycle; techno-economic analysis; levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH);
D O I
10.3390/su17041730
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The global push for clean hydrogen production has identified nuclear energy, particularly high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), as a promising solution due to their ability to provide high-temperature heat. This study conducted a techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia using the pebble bed modular reactor (HTR-PM), focusing on two methods: high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) and the sulfur-iodine (SI) thermochemical cycle. The Hydrogen Economic Evaluation Program (HEEP) was used to assess the economic viability of both methods, considering key production factors such as the discount rate, nuclear power plant (NPP) capital cost, and hydrogen plant efficiency. The results show that the SI cycle achieves a lower levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) at USD 1.22/kg H2 compared to HTSE at USD 1.47/kg H2, primarily due to higher thermal efficiency. Nonetheless, HTSE offers simpler system integration. Sensitivity analysis reveals that variations in the discount rate and NPP capital costs significantly impact both production methods, while hydrogen plant efficiency is crucial in determining overall economics. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on sustainable hydrogen production technologies by highlighting the potential of nuclear-driven methods to meet global decarbonization goals. The paper concludes that the HTR-PM offers a viable pathway for large-scale hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia, aligning with the Vision 2030 objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] A comparative economic study of nuclear hydrogen production, storage, and transportation
    Alabbadi, Ahmed A.
    Obaid, Omar A.
    Alzahrani, Abdullah A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 54 : 849 - 863
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing today's opportunities, DOI 10.1787/1-0514c4-en
  • [3] High temperature water electrolysis in solid oxide cells
    Brisse, Annabelle
    Schefold, Josef
    Zahid, Mohsine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (20) : 5375 - 5382
  • [4] Fu C., 2020, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
  • [5] Risks of Morocco's green hydrogen plans
    Hussein, Hussam
    Schuetze, Benjamin
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2024, 386 (6721) : 501 - 502
  • [6] Jordan's green-energy vision requires refinement
    Hussein, Hussam
    Khasawneh, Hussam
    [J]. NATURE, 2024, 634 (8032) : 33 - 33
  • [7] International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013, Hydrogen Production Using Nuclear EnergyIAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-4.2
  • [8] International Atomic Energy Agency, Hydrogen Economic Evaluation Program (HEEP)
  • [9] International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013, Nuclear Hydrogen Production Technology
  • [10] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2018, Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS)