MRI as a viable alternative to CT for 3D surgical planning of cavitary bone tumors

被引:0
作者
Chae, Yooseok [1 ]
Cheers, Giles Michael [1 ]
Kim, Minjoo [1 ]
Reidler, Paul [2 ]
Klein, Alexander [1 ]
Fevens, Thomas [3 ]
Holzapfel, Boris Michael [1 ]
Mayer-Wagner, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, Univ Hosp, Musculoskeletal Univ Ctr Munich MUM, Dept Orthpaed & Trauma Surg,LMU Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Concordia Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Segmentation; Bone defects; CT; MRI; Imaging; Preoperative; Tumors; GIANT-CELL TUMOR; SEGMENTATION; DIAGNOSIS; CYST;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2025.110369
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Cavitary bone defects, defined as a volumetric loss of native bone tissue, require accurate preoperative imaging for treatment planning. While CT (computed tomography) has traditionally been the gold standard for segmentation due to its superior resolution of cortical bone, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) offers unique advantages, particularly in visualizing the soft tissue-bone interface. Furthermore, MRI eliminates the ionizing radiation associated with CT, making it an advantageous alternative, especially in the management of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Despite these advantages, MRI's inherently lower spatial resolution may introduce artifacts, which can complicate segmentation accuracy. This study evaluates the feasibility of MRI as a viable alternative to CT in the preoperative planning of cavitary bone defect treatment. We analyzed CT and MRI scans from 80 patients with benign and locally aggressive primary bone tumors, generating three-dimensional (3D) models through manual segmentation in Mimics, validated using Geomagic Control X. Volumetric differences between the CT- and MRI-derived models were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired ttest. The mean volumetric difference between MRI and CT scans was 2.68 +/- 1.44 %, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Additionally, multiple regression analysis examining sex, age, and diagnosis revealed no significant differences in the 3D model volumes derived from the two imaging modalities (sex: p = 0.51, age: p = 0.98, and diagnosis: p = 0.50). These results support MRI-based segmentation as a reliable, radiation-free alternative to CT, particularly when precise delineation of soft tissue boundaries is critical for surgical planning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Do Surgical Margins Affect Local Recurrence and Survival in Extremity, Nonmetastatic, High-grade Osteosarcoma? [J].
Bertrand, Todd E. ;
Cruz, Alex ;
Binitie, Odion ;
Cheong, David ;
Letson, G. Douglas .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (03) :677-683
[2]  
Board WC of TE, 2020, WHO classification of Tumours, V5th
[3]   Deep learning-based medical image segmentation with limited labels [J].
Chi, Weicheng ;
Ma, Lin ;
Wu, Junjie ;
Chen, Mingli ;
Lu, Weiguo ;
Gu, Xuejun .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (23)
[4]  
Chodick Gabriel, 2009, Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, V7, P29
[5]   The 2020 WHO Classification of Tumors of Bone: An Updated Review [J].
Choi, Joon Hyuk ;
Ro, Jae Y. .
ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) :119-138
[6]   Benign pediatric bone tumors - Evaluation and treatment [J].
Copley, L ;
Dormans, JP .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 43 (04) :949-&
[7]   Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cyst and Its Recent Treatment Options: A Comparative Review of 74 Cases [J].
Deventer, Nils ;
Schulze, Martin ;
Gosheger, Georg ;
de Vaal, Marieke ;
Deventer, Niklas .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (10)
[8]   Measurement of bone cyst fluid volume using k-means clustering [J].
Docquier, Pierre-Louis ;
Paul, Laurent ;
Menten, Renaud ;
Cartiaux, Olivier ;
Francq, Bernard ;
Banse, Xavier .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (10) :1430-1439
[9]   Imaging Analyses of Bone Tumors [J].
Errani, Costantino ;
Tsukamoto, Shinji ;
Mavrogenis, Andreas F. .
JBJS REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (03)
[10]  
Fan B, 2023, Front Comput Intell Syst, V4, P89, DOI [10.54097/fcis.v4i3.11149, DOI 10.54097/FCIS.V4I3.11149]