Unlocking sustainable lithium: A comparative life cycle assessment of innovative extraction methods from brine

被引:3
|
作者
Nikfar, Sima [1 ]
Fahimi, Ario [1 ]
Vahidi, Ehsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Mackay Sch Earth Sci & Engn, Dept Min & Met Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Direct lithium extraction; Greenhouse gas emission; lithium carbonate; Sustainable lithium extraction; SALT LAKE BRINE; TRIBUTYL-PHOSPHATE; RECOVERY; ALUMINUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107977
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The surging demand for lithium, driven by the widespread adoption of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage systems, underscores the urgent need to develop sustainable lithium extraction methods. This study presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment Using the TRACI method to evaluate and compare the environmental impacts of solvent extraction, adsorption, nanofiltration, and membrane electrolysis as direct lithium extraction methods for recovering lithium from brine to produce lithium carbonate. In terms of global warming, the carbon dioxide emission for each process was determined as follows: solvent extraction emits 52.7 kg CO2eq/ kg of lithium carbonate, adsorption emits 47.9 CO2eq/kg of lithium carbonate, nanofiltration emits 17.7 kg CO2eq/kg of lithium carbonate, and membrane electrolysis emits 80.57 kg CO2eq/kg of lithium carbonate. As a result, the nanofiltration process emerges as the most environmentally friendly method, offering a promising solution to the environmental challenges of lithium extraction. In contrast, the membrane electrolysis process has the highest environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Uranium Recovery from Brine
    Altay, Melike Benan
    Kalipioglu, Ceyda
    Kurt, Zohre
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 181
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Assessment of Lithium Recovery from Geothermal Brine
    Huang, Tai-Yuan
    Perez-Cardona, Jesus R.
    Zhao, Fu
    Sutherland, John W.
    Paranthaman, Mariappan Parans
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (19) : 6551 - 6560
  • [3] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Merging Recycling Methods for Spent Lithium Ion Batteries
    Zhou, Zhiwen
    Lai, Yiming
    Peng, Qin
    Li, Jun
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)
  • [4] Sustainable Electrochemical Extraction of Lithium from Natural Brine for Renewable Energy Storage
    Romero, V. C. E.
    Tagliazucchi, M.
    Flexer, V.
    Calvo, E. J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 165 (10) : A2294 - A2302
  • [5] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Landfilling with Sustainable Waste Management Methods for Municipal Solid Wastes
    Ouedraogo, Angelika Sita
    Kumar, Ajay
    Frazier, Robert
    Sallam, Khaled A.
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (11)
  • [6] Comparative life cycle assessment of flooring options for sustainable buildings
    Choudhary, Kailash
    Sangwa, Narpat Ram
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2023,
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment and life extension of structures via innovative methods
    Frangopol, D. M.
    Peil, U.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD EUROPEAN WORKSHOP STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2006, 2006, : 49 - +
  • [8] A comparative life cycle assessment for sustainable cement production in Turkey
    Cankaya, Simge
    Pekey, Beyhan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 249
  • [9] A sustainable alternative? A comparative life cycle assessment of epoxy adhesives
    Anastasiou, Dimitrios E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2023, 140 (48)
  • [10] A Comparative Study of Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Concrete Mixes
    Kumari, Sunita
    Walia, Rinku
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 9 (02): : 187 - 196