ESR Essentials: how to get to valuable radiology AI: the role of early health technology assessment-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics

被引:2
作者
Kemper, Erik H. M. [1 ]
Erenstein, Hendrik [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Boverhof, Bart-Jan [5 ]
Redekop, Ken [5 ]
Andreychenko, Anna E. [6 ,7 ]
Dietzel, Matthias [8 ]
Groot Lipman, Kevin B. W. [9 ,10 ]
Huisman, Merel [11 ]
Klontzas, Michail E. [12 ,13 ,14 ]
Vos, Frans [1 ,15 ]
Ijzerman, Maarten [5 ]
Starmans, Martijn P. A. [1 ,16 ]
Visser, Jacob J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Hanze Univ Appl Sci, Dept Med Imaging & Radiat Therapy, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiotherapy, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Hanze Univ Appl Sci, Res Grp Hlth Ageing Allied Hlth Care & Nursing, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] K SkAI LLC, Petrozavodsk, Russia
[7] ITMO Univ, St Petersburg, Russia
[8] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[9] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[10] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Thorac Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[11] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[12] Univ Crete, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Iraklion, Greece
[13] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Div Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[14] Fdn Res & Technol FORTH, Inst Comp Sci, Computat Biomed Lab, Iraklion, Greece
[15] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Imaging Phys, Delft, Netherlands
[16] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Technology assessment (Biomedical); Radiology; Value-based healthcare; Stakeholder participation; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; FRAMEWORK; CARE; HTA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-024-11188-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AI tools in radiology are revolutionising the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients. However, there is a major gap between the large number of developed AI tools and those translated into daily clinical practice, which can be primarily attributed to limited usefulness and trust in current AI tools. Instead of technically driven development, little effort has been put into value-based development to ensure AI tools will have a clinically relevant impact on patient care. An iterative comprehensive value evaluation process covering the complete AI tool lifecycle should be part of radiology AI development. For value assessment of health technologies, health technology assessment (HTA) is an extensively used and comprehensive method. While most aspects of value covered by HTA apply to radiology AI, additional aspects, including transparency, explainability, and robustness, are unique to radiology AI and crucial in its value assessment. Additionally, value assessment should already be included early in the design stage to determine the potential impact and subsequent requirements of the AI tool. Such early assessment should be systematic, transparent, and practical to ensure all stakeholders and value aspects are considered. Hence, early value-based development by incorporating early HTA will lead to more valuable AI tools and thus facilitate translation to clinical practice.AbstractAI tools in radiology are revolutionising the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients. However, there is a major gap between the large number of developed AI tools and those translated into daily clinical practice, which can be primarily attributed to limited usefulness and trust in current AI tools. Instead of technically driven development, little effort has been put into value-based development to ensure AI tools will have a clinically relevant impact on patient care.An iterative comprehensive value evaluation process covering the complete AI tool lifecycle should be part of radiology AI development. For value assessment of health technologies, health technology assessment (HTA) is an extensively used and comprehensive method. While most aspects of value covered by HTA apply to radiology AI, additional aspects, including transparency, explainability, and robustness, are unique to radiology AI and crucial in its value assessment. Additionally, value assessment should already be included early in the design stage to determine the potential impact and subsequent requirements of the AI tool. Such early assessment should be systematic, transparent, and practical to ensure all stakeholders and value aspects are considered. Hence, early value-based development by incorporating early HTA will lead to more valuable AI tools and thus facilitate translation to clinical practice. Clinical relevance statement This paper advocates for the use of early value-based assessments. These assessments promote a comprehensive evaluation on how an AI tool in development can provide value in clinical practice and thus help improve the quality of these tools and the clinical process they support.
引用
收藏
页码:3432 / 3441
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Agboola F, 2023, ADV HLTH TECHNOLOGY
[2]   Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity [J].
Alami, Hassane ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Auclair, Yannick ;
de Guise, Michele ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Shaw, James ;
Roy, Denis ;
Fleet, Richard ;
Ahmed, Mohamed Ali Ag ;
Fortin, Jean-Paul .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (07)
[3]   Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment [J].
Angelis, Aris ;
Kanavos, Panos .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (05) :435-446
[4]   What Makes Artificial Intelligence Exceptional in Health Technology Assessment? [J].
Belisle-Pipon, Jean-Christophe ;
Couture, Vincent ;
Roy, Marie-Christine ;
Ganache, Isabelle ;
Goetghebeur, Mireille ;
Cohen, I. Glenn .
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 4
[5]  
Bommasani R, 2023, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2310.12941, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.12941]
[6]   Radiology AI Deployment and Assessment Rubric (RADAR) to bring value-based AI into radiological practice [J].
Boverhof, Bart-Jan ;
Redekop, W. Ken ;
Bos, Daniel ;
Starmans, Martijn P. A. ;
Birch, Judy ;
Rockall, Andrea ;
Visser, Jacob J. .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01)
[7]   Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA [J].
Brady, Adrian P. ;
Allen, Bibb ;
Chong, Jaron ;
Kotter, Elmar ;
Kottler, Nina ;
Mongan, John ;
Oakden-Rayner, Lauren ;
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto ;
Tang, An ;
Wald, Christoph ;
Slavotinek, John .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01)
[8]   Radiology in the Era of Value-based Healthcare: A Multi-Society Expert Statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, IS3R, RANZCR, and RSNA [J].
Brady, Adrian P. ;
Bello, Jaqueline A. ;
Derchi, Lorenzo E. ;
Fuchsjaeger, Michael ;
Goergen, Stacy ;
Krestin, Gabriel P. ;
Lee, Emil J. Y. ;
Levin, David C. ;
Pressacco, Josephine ;
Rao, Vijay M. ;
Slavotinek, John ;
Visser, Jacob J. ;
Walker, Richard E. A. ;
Brink, James A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) :486-491
[9]   THE EARLY BIRD CATCHES THE WORM: EARLY COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NEW MEDICAL TESTS [J].
Buisman, Leander R. ;
Rutten-van Moelkn, Maureen P. M. H. ;
Postmus, Douwe ;
Luime, Jolanda J. ;
Uyl-de Groot, Carin A. ;
Redekop, William K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (1-2) :46-53
[10]  
Chapman AM, 2014, IFMBE P, V41, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-00846-2285, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-00846-2285]