Equal Opportunity Left-Libertarianism and a Basic Income Guarantee

被引:0
作者
Morozov, Konstantin [1 ]
机构
[1] RAS, Inst Philosophy, Dept Eth, Moscow, Russia
关键词
basic income; libertarianism; equality of opportunity; natural rights; distributive justice; well-being; SELF-OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1515/bis-2024-0009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Left-libertarianism comes in two main varieties: equal share and equal opportunity for well-being. Although equal share left-libertarians have supported a basic income guarantee, its equal opportunity counterparts either ignore a basic income in their theorizing or reject it. This article offers four reasons why left-libertarians should consider a basic income as a way to promote equality of opportunity for well-being: a basic income enhances self-respect, a basic income opens up the possibility of personal projects beyond traditional employment, a basic income protects negative freedom, and a basic income minimizes potential for abuses and mistakes of centralized authorities. Peter Vallentyne's objection to basic income is also considered. His asset-oriented account of the Lockean proviso is rejected in favor of an equality-promoting account that requires a substantial basic income.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 58
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   SELF-OWNERSHIP AND WORLD OWNERSHIP: AGAINST LEFT-LIBERTARIANISM [J].
Arneson, Richard J. .
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 2010, 27 (01) :168-194
[2]   Human flourishing versus desire satisfaction [J].
Arneson, RJ .
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 1999, 16 (01) :113-142
[3]  
Burczak T, 2013, EXPLOR BASIC INCOME, P49
[4]  
Chartier G., 2009, EC JUSTICE NATURAL L
[5]  
Cholbi M., 2019, The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income
[6]  
Christmas B., 2021, PROPERTY JUSTICE LIB
[7]   Ambidextrous Lockeanism [J].
Christmas, Billy .
ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 36 (02) :193-215
[8]  
Cohen GeraldAllan., 1995, SELF OWNERSHIP FREED, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511521270, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511521270]
[9]  
Crisp Roger., 2021, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, VWinter 2021 ed.
[10]  
Daskal S., 2010, SOCIAL THEORY PRACTI, V36, P21, DOI [https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20103612, DOI 10.5840/SOCTHEORPRACT20103612]