Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol

被引:0
作者
Njagi, Purity [1 ]
Groot, Wim [1 ,2 ]
Arsenijevic, Jelena [3 ]
Mburu, Gitau [4 ]
Chambers, Georgina [5 ,6 ]
Calhaz-Jorge, Carlos [7 ]
Kiarie, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, UNU Maastricht Econ & Social Res Inst Innovat & T, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Fac Law Econ & Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] World Hlth Org, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit NPESU, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Sch Clin Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Lisbon, Clin Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
LIVE BIRTH; ACCESS; MULTIPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0318780
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Infertility affects one in six people globally, with similar prevalence rates across high-income and low- and middle-income countries. Technological advancements, particularly in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), have improved fertility treatment options. Although access to ART is presumed to be better in high-income countries (HICs), economic factors and eligibility restrictions could still impact effective utilization in these settings. Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols (PRISMA-P), this protocol outlines the methodological and analytical approaches to examine the ART costs paid by patients in HICs and the correlation with economic indicators and ART regulatory frameworks. Methods Following the PRISMA approach, we will search for articles indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Latin American & Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). Grey literature from relevant organizations' virtual databases will also be searched. The review will encompass studies published between 2001 and 2024, with the primary outcome being ART direct medical and direct non-medical costs, while secondary outcomes shall include ART financing arrangements. The review will synthesize ART costs, adjusting them to USD Purchasing Power Parity for cross-country comparison, and correlate findings with GNI per capita and ART financing policies. The Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) tool will be utilized to evaluate the quality of the included studies. We will conduct a meta-analysis if the studies provide sufficient cost-effect size estimates. Discussion The review findings will contribute to our understanding of the potential financial burden faced by (disadvantaged) individuals in HICs due to ART costs. Additionally, the review shall highlight the implications that ART financing policies have in enhancing access and affordability, offering valuable insights for healthcare planning and policy formulation. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal article and relevant international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies
    Adamson, G. David
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 5 (04) : 351 - 358
  • [2] Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
    Amir-Behghadami, Mehrdad
    Janati, Ali
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (06) : 387 - 387
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990-2021
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, World bank country and lending groups: World bank group
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Gonadotropin Treatments HP-hMG and rFSH for Assisted Reproductive Technology in France: A Markov Model Analysis
    Barriere, Paul
    Porcu-Buisson, Geraldine
    Hamamah, Samir
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 16 (01) : 65 - 77
  • [6] Utilization of Infertility Treatments: The Effects of Insurance Mandates
    Bitler, Marianne P.
    Schmidt, Lucie
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 2012, 49 (01) : 125 - 149
  • [7] The economic burden of infertility treatment and distribution of expenditures overtime in France: a self-controlled pre-post study
    Bourrion, B.
    Panjo, H.
    Bithorel, P-L
    de la Rochebrochard, E.
    Francois, M.
    Pelletier-Fleury, N.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
    Calhaz-Jorge, C.
    De Geyter, C. h
    Kupka, M. S.
    Wyns, C.
    Mocanu, E.
    Motrenko, T.
    Scaravelli, G.
    Smeenk, J.
    Vidakovic, S.
    Goossens, V.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2020, 2020 (01)
  • [9] International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    Dyer, Silke
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    de Mouzon, Jacques
    Ishihara, Osamu
    Banker, Manish
    Mansour, Ragaa
    Kupka, Markus S.
    Adamson, G. David
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (11) : 2921 - 2934
  • [10] The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    Van Phuong Hoang
    Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
    Chapman, Michael G.
    Ishihara, Osamu
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Nygren, Karl G.
    Adamson, G. David
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (01) : 191 - +