On the interaction between planar incident shock with finite width and cylindrical boundary layer at Mach 2.0

被引:0
作者
Li, Fangbo [1 ]
Huang, Hexia [1 ]
Tan, Huijun [1 ]
Li, Xin [1 ]
Yu, Hang [1 ]
Qin, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
关键词
supersonic flow; shock waves; boundary layer separation; WAVE; SWEPT; WALL; REFLECTION; TRANSITION; SIMILARITY; SEPARATION; CYLINDER; MODEL; FLOW;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2024.1132
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The interaction between planar incident shocks and cylindrical boundary layers is prevalent in missiles equipped with inverted inlets, which typically leads to substantial three-dimensional flow separation and the formation of vortical flow. This study utilizes wind-tunnel experiments and theoretical analysis to elucidate the shock structure, surface topology and pressure distributions induced by a planar shock with finite width impinging on a cylinder wall at Mach 2.0. In the central region, a refraction phenomenon occurs as the transmitted shock bends within the boundary layer, generating a series of compression waves that coalesce into a shock, forming a 'shock triangle' structure. As the incident shock propagates backward along both sides, it gradually evolves into a Mach stem, where the transmitted shock refracts the expansion wave. The incident shock interacts with the boundary layer, resulting in the formation of a highly swept separation region that yields a pair of counter-rotating horseshoe-like vortices above the separation lines. These vortices facilitate the accumulation of low-energy fluid on both sides. Although the interaction of the symmetry plane aligns with free-interaction-theory, the separation shock angle away from the centre significantly deviates from the predicted value owing to the accumulation of low-energy fluids. The primary separation line and pressure distribution jointly exhibit an elliptical similarity on the cylindrical surface. Furthermore, the potential unsteady behaviour is assessed, and the Strouhal number of the low-frequency oscillation is found to be 0.0094, which is insufficient to trigger significant alterations in the flow field structure.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   PHYSICAL MODEL OF THE SWEPT SHOCK-WAVE BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION FLOWFIELD [J].
ALVI, FS ;
SETTLES, GS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1992, 30 (09) :2252-2258
[2]  
Anderson J., 2010, FUNDAMENTALS AERODYN
[3]  
Babinsky H., 2011, Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions
[4]   SBLI control for wings and inlets [J].
Babinsky, Holger ;
Ogawa, Hideaki .
SHOCK WAVES, 2008, 18 (02) :89-96
[5]   THE INTERACTION OF SHOCK WAVES WITH BOUNDARY LAYERS ON A FLAT SURFACE [J].
BARRY, FW ;
SHAPIRO, AH ;
NEUMANN, EP .
JOURNAL OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1951, 18 (04) :229-&
[6]   On the scaling of three-dimensional shock-induced separated flow due to protuberances [J].
Bhardwaj, S. ;
Vamsi, K. Hemanth Chandra ;
Sriram, R. .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (07)
[7]   EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF A SHOCK-WAVE IMPINGEMENT ON A CYLINDER [J].
BROSH, A ;
KUSSOY, MI ;
HUNG, CM .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1985, 23 (06) :840-846
[8]   Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet [J].
Chang, Juntao ;
Li, Nan ;
Xu, Kejing ;
Bao, Wen ;
Yu, Daren .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2017, 89 :1-22
[9]  
Chapman D.R., 1958, NACA-TR-1356
[10]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492