Single Position Lateral Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1

被引:1
作者
Stienen, Martin N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yoo, Kelly [4 ,5 ]
Schonfeld, Ethan [5 ]
Shah, Vaihabi [5 ]
Abikenari, Matthew [5 ]
Pangal, Dhiraj [4 ,5 ]
Chandra, Venita [4 ,6 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Spine Ctr Eastern Switzerland, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] St Gallen Med Sch, St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Dept Neurosurg, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, 213 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Neurosurg Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ALIF; lateral decubitus position; single position; complications; outcomes; minimally invasive surgery; technique; OBJECTIVE MEASURES; COMPLICATIONS; OBESITY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; SUPINE; IMPACT; INDEX; L5-S1;
D O I
10.1227/neu.0000000000003332
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an established surgical approach for spinal fusion, offering distinct advantages in restoring lumbar lordosis, indirectly decompressing neural elements, and facilitating high fusion rates because of the increase in the fusion surface area. Traditionally, ALIF is performed with the patient in a supine position, necessitating repositioning for additional posterior interventions, which increases operative time, anesthetic time, and complexity. The recent development of single position lateral ALIF (SPL-ALIF) enables anterior and posterior access without repositioning, enables gravity facilitated retroperitoneal access, and optimizes surgical efficiency, particularly in cases necessitating multilevel anterior column fusion. The current review comprehensively examines SPL-ALIF at the L5-S1 level, presenting technical considerations and comparative benefits over traditional techniques. The approach has demonstrated significant reductions in operative time, blood loss, and postoperative ileus, with equivalent radiographic outcomes compared with supine ALIF. Furthermore, SPL-ALIF has been evidenced to have a similar safety profile to supine ALIF with equivalent vascular, abdominal, and neurological complications, as well as comparable revision rates between the two procedures. However, SPL-ALIF is not without limitations. The technique may be less effective in cases requiring direct decompression or in patients with complex vascular anatomy or extensive retroperitoneal scarring. These challenges necessitate careful patient selection to optimize outcomes and minimize intraoperative risks. Future studies are warranted to validate the clinical benefits of SPL-ALIF, particularly concerning fusion rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complication profiles, thereby solidifying its role in the evolving landscape of minimally invasive spine surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:S17 / S25
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Postoperative spinal alignment comparison of lateral versus supine patient position L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Khajavi, Kaveh ;
Menezes, Cristiano M. ;
Braly, Brett A. ;
Thomas, J. Alex .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (09) :2248-2254
[22]   Subjective and Objective Measures of Symptoms, Function, and Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Spine Disease [J].
Maldaner, Nicolai ;
Stienen, Martin Nikolaus .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 72 :183-199
[23]  
Malham Gregory M, 2019, J Spine Surg, V5, P433, DOI 10.21037/jss.2019.09.09
[24]   Intra-abdominal Content Movement in Prone Versus Lateral Decubitus Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) [J].
Menezes, Cristiano M. ;
Andrade, Luciene M. ;
Lacerda, Gabriel C. ;
Salomao, Marlus M. ;
Freeborn, Mark T. ;
Thomas, J. Alex .
SPINE, 2024, 49 (06) :426-431
[25]   Need of vascular surgeon and comparison of value for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in lateral decubitus: Delphi consensus [J].
Menezes, Cristiano Magalhaes ;
Alamin, Todd ;
Amaral, Rodrigo ;
Carvalho, Alexandry Dias ;
Diaz, Roberto ;
Guiroy, Alfredo ;
Lam, Khai S. ;
Lamartina, Claudio ;
Perez-Contreras, Alberto ;
Rivera-Colon, Yamil ;
Smith, Willian ;
Taboada, Nestor ;
Timothy, Jake ;
Langella, Francesco ;
Berjano, Pedro .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (09) :2270-2278
[26]   Underweight patients are the highest risk body mass index group for perioperative adverse events following stand- alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Ottesen, Taylor D. ;
Galivanche, Anoop R. ;
Greene, Janelle D. ;
Malpani, Rohil ;
Varthi, Arya G. ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (07) :1139-1148
[27]   Anatomic evaluation of retroperitoneal organs for lateral approach surgery: a prospective imaging study using computed tomography in the lateral decubitus position [J].
Ouchida, Jun ;
Kanemura, Tokumi ;
Satake, Kotaro ;
Nakashima, Hiroaki ;
Segi, Naoki .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (04) :835-841
[28]   Impact of Supine versus Prone Positioning on Segmental Lumbar Lordosis in Patients Undergoing ALIF Followed by PSF: A Comparative Study [J].
Sadeghzadeh, Sina ;
Yoo, Kelly H. ;
Lopez, Ivan ;
Johnstone, Thomas ;
Schonfeld, Ethan ;
Haider, Ghani ;
Marianayagam, Neelan J. ;
Stienen, Martin N. ;
Veeravagu, Anand .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (12)
[29]   Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages - Considerations, complications & outcomes [J].
Stienen, Martin N. ;
Fischer, Gregor ;
Battig, Linda ;
Veeravagu, Anand ;
Martens, Benjamin .
BRAIN AND SPINE, 2024, 4
[30]   Objective measures of functional impairment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Stienen, Martin N. ;
Ho, Allen L. ;
Staartjes, Victor E. ;
Maldaner, Nicolai ;
Veeravagu, Anand ;
Desai, Atman ;
Gautschi, Oliver P. ;
Bellut, David ;
Regli, Luca ;
Ratliff, John K. ;
Park, Jon .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07) :1276-1293