New Drug Expenditure by Therapeutic Area in South Korea: International Comparison and Policy Implications

被引:0
作者
Yu, Seung-Rae [1 ]
Choi, Sooyoung [2 ]
机构
[1] Dong Duk Womens Univ, Coll Pharm, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
pharmaceutical expenditures; new chemical entities (NCEs); disease burden; DALYs; South Korea; OECD; health policy; risk-sharing agreements;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare13050468
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pharmaceutical expenditures serve as key indicators of healthcare system efficiency, innovation, and sustainability. South Korea has implemented policies such as the economic evaluation exemption (EEE) and risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) to balance cost control and access to innovative therapies. However, discrepancies persist in the distribution of expenditures across therapeutic areas, raising concerns about alignment with public health needs. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed pharmaceutical expenditures in South Korea from 2007 to 2022, focusing on new chemical entities (NCEs). Data sources included the IQVIA MIDAS Global Database, the WHO Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database, and South Korea's national health insurance records. Expenditure patterns were benchmarked against OECD and A8 countries using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and other healthcare metrics to assess the relationship between spending and disease burden. Results: By 2022, South Korea had introduced 276 NCEs, demonstrating progress, but still lagging the OECD average. NCE expenditure increased from 10.0% to 16.0% of total pharmaceutical spending between 2017 and 2022, whereas A8 countries' share rose from 26.2% to 48.1%. While oncology expenditures were proportionate to disease burden, spending on chronic diseases such as musculoskeletal and cardiovascular conditions remained relatively low compared to their DALY contributions. Conclusions: Although South Korea has strengthened its investment in pharmaceutical innovation, disparities in expenditure distribution persist. Refining policies to enhance resource allocation for chronic diseases and expanding the RSA framework beyond oncology could improve equity and sustainability. Adopting international best practices-such as indication-based pricing and funding mechanisms for high-cost therapies-may further support optimal pharmaceutical expenditure management.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Health Systems Strengthening Glossary
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Global Health Estimates: Life Expectancy and Leading Causes of Death and Disability
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, [No title captured]
  • [4] Tuberculosis treatment in the private healthcare sector in India: an analysis of recent trends and volumes using drug sales data
    Arinaminpathy, Nimalan
    Batra, Deepak
    Maheshwari, Nilesh
    Swaroop, Kishan
    Sharma, Lokesh
    Sachdeva, Kuldeep Singh
    Khaparde, Sunil
    Rao, Raghuram
    Gupta, Devesh
    Vadera, Bhavin
    Nair, Sreenivas A.
    Rade, Kiran
    Kumta, Sameer
    Dewan, Puneet
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [5] Branning G, 2016, AM HEALTH DRUG BENEF, V9, P445
  • [6] Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience
    Ciulla, Michele
    Marinelli, Lisa
    Di Biase, Giuseppe
    Cacciatore, Ivana
    Santoleri, Fiorenzo
    Costantini, Alberto
    Dimmito, Marilisa Pia
    Di Stefano, Antonio
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [7] Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
    Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina
    Jackson, Matthew J.
    Zhou, Edward W.
    Ledley, Fred D.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2023, 4 (04): : E230511
  • [8] Cylus Jonathan, 2015, Health Syst Transit, V17, P1
  • [9] Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), Statistics
  • [10] Pharmaceutical price regulation and its impact on drug innovation: mitigating the trade-offs
    Kakkar, Ashish Kumar
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2021, 31 (03) : 189 - 192