The relationship between marital status and survival in primary bone cancer: a population-based study

被引:0
作者
Huang, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Tian, Leilei [1 ]
Li, Chuang [1 ]
Liu, Jinling [1 ]
Shi, Rui
Lin, Fang [1 ]
Luo, Yi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Nursing, Operating Room, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthopaed Res Inst, 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Primary bone cancer; marital status; overall survival (OS); cancer-specific survival (CSS); IMPACT; GENDER;
D O I
10.21037/tcr-24-1215
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated a significant impact of marital status on the prognosis of various cancers; however, its specific influence on the prognosis of primary bone cancer remains insufficiently investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the survival differences between male and female in patients diagnosed with primary bone cancer. Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was utilized to identify suitable patients. Patients were categorized into married and unmarried groups, with a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method used to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank tests were then employed to ascertain differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the groups, followed by gender-based subgroup analyses. A multivariate Cox regression was finally conducted to adjust for the effects of covariates. Results: A total of 8,208 patients were included in this study, comprising 4,650 married and 3,558 unmarried individuals. Significant baseline characteristic differences were observed between the two groups before PSM. After PSM, 3,138 patients from each group were included, with balance maintained in all considered baseline characteristics. Before PSM, married patients had better OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.99, P=0.047] compared to unmarried patients, but no significant difference in CSS (HR =0.95, 95% CI: 0.88-1.03, P=0.21). Following PSM, married patients exhibited significantly better OS (HR =0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.92, P<0.001) and CSS (HR =0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99, P=0.045) than unmarried patients. However, in subgroup analyses, the survival benefit attributed to marriage was observed only in females, not in males. In Cox regression, marriage was identified as an independent protective factor for OS (HR =0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.93, P<0.001) and CSS (HR =0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-0.97, P=0.04). Conclusions: In patients with primary malignant bone cancer, marriage is a protective factor for survival, but this effect appears to be limited to females.
引用
收藏
页码:5898 / 5908
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Marital Status and Survival in Patients With Cancer [J].
Aizer, Ayal A. ;
Chen, Ming-Hui ;
McCarthy, Ellen P. ;
Mendu, Mallika L. ;
Koo, Sophia ;
Wilhite, Tyler J. ;
Graham, Powell L. ;
Choueiri, Toni K. ;
Hoffman, Karen E. ;
Martin, Neil E. ;
Hu, Jim C. ;
Nguyen, Paul L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (31) :3869-3876
[2]   NCCN Guidelines® Insights Bone Cancer, Version 2.2017 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines [J].
Biermann, J. Sybil ;
Chow, Warren ;
Reed, Damon R. ;
Lucas, David ;
Adkins, Douglas R. ;
Agulnik, Mark ;
Benjamin, Robert S. ;
Brigman, Brian ;
Budd, G. Thomas ;
Curry, William T. ;
Didwania, Aarati ;
Fabbri, Nicola ;
Hornicek, Francis J. ;
Kuechle, Joseph B. ;
Lindskog, Dieter ;
Mayerson, Joel ;
McGarry, Sean V. ;
Million, Lynn ;
Morris, Carol D. ;
Movva, Sujana ;
O'Donnell, Richard J. ;
Randall, R. Lor ;
Rose, Peter ;
Santana, Victor M. ;
Satcher, Robert L. ;
Schwartz, Herbert ;
Siegel, Herrick J. ;
Thornton, Katherine ;
Villalobos, Victor ;
Bergman, Mary Anne ;
Scavone, Jillian L. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (02) :155-167
[3]   Effect of marital status on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database [J].
Chen, Qing ;
Zhao, Jinyan ;
Xue, Xiang ;
Xie, Xiuying .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
[4]   A study on the impact of marital status on the survival status of prostate cancer patients based on propensity score matching [J].
Chen, Qingquan ;
Zhu, Xi ;
Hu, Yiming ;
Chen, Yao ;
Dai, Rongrong ;
Li, Jiaxin ;
Zhuang, Jiajing ;
Lin, Yifei ;
Zeng, Yifu ;
You, Liuxia ;
Zeng, Yanyu ;
Huang, Qian .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
[5]   Assessment of Modifiable Factors for the Association of Marital Status With Cancer-Specific Survival [J].
Chen, Zi-Hang ;
Yang, Kai-Bin ;
Zhang, Yuan-zhe ;
Wu, Chen-Fei ;
Wen, Dan-Wan ;
Lv, Jia-Wei ;
Zhu, Guang-Li ;
Du, Xiao-Jing ;
Chen, Lei ;
Zhou, Guan-Qun ;
Liu, Qing ;
Sun, Ying ;
Ma, Jun ;
Xu, Cheng ;
Lin, Li .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (05)
[6]   Surgical management of sarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients [J].
Hashimoto, Kazuhiko ;
Nishimura, Shunji ;
Oka, Naohiro ;
Akagi, Masao .
BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2020, 13 (01)
[7]   Cancer statistics, 2002 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Thomas, A ;
Murray, T ;
Thun, M .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (01) :23-47
[8]   Marital Status and Risk of Physical Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Kojima, Gotaro ;
Walters, Kate ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Taniguchi, Yu ;
Tamiya, Nanako .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (03) :322-330
[9]   Marital status and survival in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Krajc, Kaja ;
Mirosevic, Spela ;
Sajovic, Jakob ;
Ketis, Zalika Klemenc ;
Spiegel, David ;
Drevensek, Gorazd ;
Drevensek, Martina .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02) :1685-1708
[10]   Marital status and gender affect stage, tumor grade, treatment type and cancer specific mortality in T1-2 N0 M0 renal cell carcinoma [J].
Marchioni, Michele ;
Martel, Tristan ;
Bandini, Marco ;
Pompe, Raisa S. ;
Tian, Zhe ;
Kapoor, Anil ;
Cindolo, Luca ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Schips, Luigi ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (12) :1899-1905