Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study

被引:0
作者
Ettinger, Jack [1 ]
Patel, Anita [2 ]
Ohrnberger, Julius [2 ]
Moore, Chris [2 ]
Bhudiya, Manjula [2 ]
Smith, Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Econ Unit, Stoke On Trent, England
[2] Ipsos MORI UK Ltd, London, England
关键词
COPD Exacerbations; Surveys and Questionnaires; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PATIENT PREFERENCES; HEALTH; MEDICATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001914
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Treatment options for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are numerous but adherence remains a key challenge. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) of patients' preferences in accessing care for the management of COPD. The aim of this study was to understand patients' preferences for modes of accessing care for the management of COPD. This piece of work was then used to inform resource allocation decisions in five integrated care systems (ICSs) in England.Methods People with diagnosed COPD in five ICSs were invited to complete an online survey from August to September 2022. An experimental design built on the principles of minimal overlap, level balance and orthogonality was used to create 20 sets of 11 scenarios for participants to assess. Participants were presented with three hypothetical options and asked to select their most preferred or state that none was preferred. Data were analysed using a hierarchal Bayes algorithm.Results Of 82 639 patients with COPD in the study area, 520 completed the survey. The mean health-related quality of life score derived using EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level was 0.57 (0.29). The attributes assigned greatest importance were treatment outcomes, treatment delivery and the type of staff who deliver treatment. Mean utility level scores were substantially higher for little relief (22.75 (SD 78.80)) or some relief from symptoms (20.67 (46.77)) than for complete relief (-43.42 (83.03)). Of the treatment delivery options, in-person individual appointments were preferred (mean utility score 48.34 (SD 48.14)), and care being provided by healthcare professionals was viewed as very important (77.50 (64.39)).Conclusions The DCE approach can help resource allocation decisions by indicating attributes most important to patients and trade-offs they are willing to make in treatment access and delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] STAR-People-Powered Prioritization: A 21st-Century Solution to Allocation Headaches
    Airoldi, Mara
    Morton, Alec
    Smith, Jenifer A. E.
    Bevan, Gwyn
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (08) : 965 - 975
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Ethnic group, England and Wales: Census 2021
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Engagement Framework: EMA and patients, consumers and their organisations
  • [4] Exploring beliefs of Pulmonary Rehabilitation modes of delivery
    Barradell, Amy
    Larkin, Michael
    Singh, Sally
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [5] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [6] Service implications from a comparison of the evidence on the effectiveness and a survey of provision in England and Wales of COPD specialist nurse services in the community
    Candy, Bridget
    Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
    Ramsay, Jean
    Esmond, Glenda
    Griffiths, Chris J.
    Bryar, Rosamund M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2007, 44 (04) : 601 - 610
  • [7] A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Collacott, Hannah
    Zhang, Dian
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    Tervonen, Tommi
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01) : 55 - 68
  • [8] Combining service design and discrete choice experiments for intervention design: An application to weather index insurance
    Dehmel, Naira
    Ran, Ylva
    Osborne, Matthew
    Verschoor, Arjan
    Lambe, Fiona
    Balungira, Joshua
    Tabacco, Giovanni Alberto
    Perez-Viana, Borja
    Widmark, Erik
    Holmlid, Stefan
    [J]. METHODSX, 2021, 8
  • [9] Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency, 2023, General guidelines for economic evaluations from the pharmaceutical benefits board (LFNAR 2003:2)
  • [10] Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and uptake from primary care for people living with COPD: a mixed-methods study
    Early, Frances
    Wilson, Patricia Mary
    Deaton, Christi
    Wellwood, Ian
    Haque, Hena Wali
    Fox, Sarah Emma
    Yousaf, Azka
    Meysner, Oliver D.
    Ward, James R.
    Singh, Sally J.
    Fuld, Jonathan Paul
    [J]. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (01)