A Framework Towards Assessing the Resilience of Urban Transport Systems

被引:0
作者
Rocher, Gerald [1 ]
Tigli, Jean-Yves [1 ]
Lavirotte, Stephane [1 ]
Ferry, Nicolas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote dAzur UniCA, CNRS, I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France
[2] Univ Cote dAzur UniCA, I3S, INRIA Kairos, Sophia Antipolis, France
来源
19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, ARES 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Critical Infrastructure; Transportation System; Performance; Resilience; Simulation; RDF-star; Input/Output Hidden Markov Model; SEMANTIC WEB; THINGS; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1145/3664476.3670435
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As critical cyber-physical systems, urban transport systems are vulnerable to natural disasters and deliberate attacks. Ensuring their resilience is crucial for sustainable operations and includes the ability to withstand, absorb and recover efficiently from disruptions. Assessing the resilience of such systems requires a comprehensive set of performance indicators covering social, economic, organisational, environmental and technical concerns. In addition, the interdependence of the different modes of transport and the resulting human activities requires the inclusion of the spatial dimension to capture potential cascading failures. Furthermore, the integration of both aleatory (data) and epistemic (modelling) uncertainties is essential for robust performance indicators. Current methods for assessing the resilience of transport systems lack standardised performance indicator systems and assessment methods, making comparative analysis and benchmarking of disruption management strategies difficult. This paper proposes a unified framework for modelling and assessing performance indicators for urban transport systems. The framework is demonstrated using a simulated scenario in Eclipse SUMO and paves the way for future research in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying uncertainty and trade-offs in resilience assessments
    Allen, Craig R.
    Birge, Hannah E.
    Angeler, David G.
    Arnold, Craig Anthony
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    DeCaro, Daniel A.
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    Gunderson, Lance
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (01):
  • [2] Uncertainty handling in semantic reasoning for accurate context understanding
    Aloulou, Hamdi
    Mokhtari, Mounir
    Tiberghien, Thibaut
    Endelin, Romain
    Biswas, Jit
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2015, 77 : 16 - 28
  • [3] Using Semantic Web for Internet of Things Interoperability: A Systematic Review
    Androcec, Darko
    Novak, Matija
    Oreski, Dijana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON SEMANTIC WEB AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 14 (04) : 147 - 171
  • [4] Angles R, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5318, P114, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_8
  • [5] Azemi Nur Liesa Mohammad, 2021, International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, V8, P422
  • [6] Quality of Information as an indicator of Trust in the Internet of Things
    Baqa, Hamza
    Nguyen Binh Truong
    Crespi, Noel
    Lee, Gyu Myoung
    Le Gall, Franck
    [J]. 2018 17TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE TRUSTCOM) / 12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (IEEE BIGDATASE), 2018, : 204 - 211
  • [7] Bechhofer Sean, 2004, W3C recommendation
  • [8] Bellini E., 2023, Urban Resilience: Methodologies, Tools and Evaluation: Theory and Practice, P49
  • [9] A Survey of Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes Based on IoT Sensors Algorithms: Taxonomies, Challenges, and Opportunities with Deep Learning
    Bouchabou, Damien
    Nguyen, Sao Mai
    Lohr, Christophe
    LeDuc, Benoit
    Kanellos, Ioannis
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (18)
  • [10] Sensor Reliability in Cyber-Physical Systems Using Internet-of-Things Data: A Review and Case Study
    Castano, Fernando
    Strzelczak, Stanislaw
    Villalonga, Alberto
    Haber, Rodolfo E.
    Kossakowska, Joanna
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (19)