Discourse Analysis via Questions and Answers: Parsing Dependency Structures of Questions Under Discussion

被引:0
|
作者
Ko, Wei-Jen [1 ]
Wu, Yating [2 ]
Dalton, Cutter [4 ]
Srinivas, Dananjay [4 ]
Durrett, Greg [1 ]
Li, Junyi Jessy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Comp Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Elect & Comp Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Linguist, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Colorado Boulder, Linguist, Boulder, CO USA
来源
FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2023) | 2023年
关键词
COHERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Automatic discourse processing is bottlenecked by data: current discourse formalisms pose highly demanding annotation tasks involving large taxonomies of discourse relations, making them inaccessible to lay annotators. This work instead adopts the linguistic framework of Questions Under Discussion (QUD) for discourse analysis and seeks to derive QUD structures automatically. QUD views each sentence as an answer to a question triggered in prior context; thus, we characterize relationships between sentences as free-form questions, in contrast to exhaustive fine-grained taxonomies. We develop the first-of-its-kind QUD parser that derives a dependency structure of questions over full documents, trained using a large, crowdsourced question-answering dataset DCQA (Ko et al., 2022). Human evaluation results show that QUD dependency parsing is possible for language models trained with this crowdsourced, generalizable annotation scheme. We illustrate how our QUD structure is distinct from RST trees, and demonstrate the utility of QUD analysis in the context of document simplification. Our findings show that QUD parsing is an appealing alternative for automatic discourse processing.
引用
收藏
页码:11181 / 11195
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NCI's provocative questions on cancer: some answers to ignite discussion
    Blagosklonny, Mikhail V.
    ONCOTARGET, 2011, 2 (12) : 1352 - 1367
  • [32] New use of an old discourse marker: The rise of prefacing answers to questions with so
    Graves, Syelle
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2024, 225 : 69 - 86
  • [33] Elaborative Simplification as Implicit Questions Under Discussion
    Wu, Yating
    Sheffield, William
    Mahowald, Kyle
    Li, Junyi Jessy
    2023 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, EMNLP 2023, 2023, : 5525 - 5537
  • [34] QUESTIONS UNDER DISCUSSION AND THE SEMANTICS/PRAGMATICS DIVIDE
    Grindrod, Jumbly
    Borg, Emma
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2019, 69 (275): : 418 - 426
  • [35] The Cultural Analysis of Law: Questions and Answers with Paul Kahn
    Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla
    GERMAN LAW JOURNAL, 2020, 21 (02): : 284 - 298
  • [36] Out-of-Domain Discourse Dependency Parsing via Bootstrapping: An Empirical Analysis on Its Effectiveness and Limitation
    Nishida, Noriki
    Matsumoto, Yuji
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 2022, 10 : 127 - 144
  • [37] Questions and Answers. Knowledge Constitution in Controversies using the Example of the Glyphosate-Discourse
    Simon, Niklas
    Janich, Nina
    FACHSPRACHE-JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION, 2021, 43 (1-2): : 22 - 51
  • [38] Enhancing Visual Question Answering via Deconstructing Questions and Explicating Answers
    Chen, Feilong
    Han, Minglun
    Shi, Jing
    Xu, Shuang
    Xu, Bo
    INTERSPEECH 2023, 2023, : 3447 - 3451
  • [39] Characterizing Types of Diabetes Clinical Questions and Answers Provided via eConsults
    Gill, Gurleen
    Zankar, Sarah
    Goulet, Danica
    Liddy, Clare
    Afkham, Amir
    Keely, Erin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2024, 48 (04) : 269 - 272
  • [40] Music questions in social Q&A: an analysis of Yahoo! Answers
    Hertzum, Morten
    Borlund, Pia
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2017, 73 (05) : 992 - 1009