A review of test methods for uniaxial compressive strength of rocks: Theory, apparatus and data processing

被引:4
|
作者
Xie, Wei-Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiao-Li [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Ping [3 ]
Liu, Quan-Sheng [3 ]
Wang, En-Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Yunlong Lake Lab Deep Underground Sci & Engn, Xuzhou 221000, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab Safety Geotech & Struct Engn Hubei Prov, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS); UCS testing methods; Test apparatus; Data processing; BLOCK PUNCH INDEX; ISRM SUGGESTED METHOD; POINT-LOAD STRENGTH; PENETRATION TEST; NEURAL-NETWORKS; SCHMIDT HAMMER; METAMORPHIC ROCKS; TENSILE STRENGTHS; CYLINDRICAL PUNCH; ELASTIC-MODULUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.05.003
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks is a vital geomechanical parameter widely used for rock mass classification, stability analysis, and engineering design in rock engineering. Various UCS testing methods and apparatuses have been proposed over the past few decades. The objective of the present study is to summarize the status and development in theories, test apparatuses, data processing of the existing testing methods for UCS measurement. It starts with elaborating the theories of these test methods. Then the test apparatus and development trends for UCS measurement are summarized, followed by a discussion on rock specimens for test apparatus, and data processing methods. Next, the method selection for UCS measurement is recommended. It reveals that the rock failure mechanism in the UCS testing methods can be divided into compression-shear, compression-tension, composite failure mode, and no obvious failure mode. The trends of these apparatuses are towards automation, digitization, precision, and multi-modal test. Two size correction methods are commonly used. One is to develop empirical correlation between the measured indices and the specimen size. The other is to use a standard specimen to calculate the size correction factor. Three to five input parameters are commonly utilized in soft computation models to predict the UCS of rocks. The selection of the test methods for the UCS measurement can be carried out according to the testing scenario and the specimen size. The engineers can gain a comprehensive understanding of the UCS testing methods and its potential developments in various rock engineering endeavors. (c) 2025 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1889 / 1905
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREDICTION OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ROCKS: A REVIEW PAPER
    Momeni, Ehsan
    Nazir, Ramli
    Armaghani, Danial Jahed
    Amin, Mohd For Mohd
    Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 77 (11): : 43 - 50
  • [22] Predictive model for uniaxial compressive strength for Grade III granitic rocks from Macao
    Ng, Iok-Tong
    Yuen, Ka-Veng
    Lau, Chi-Hou
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2015, 199 : 28 - 37
  • [23] Several machine learning techniques comparison for the prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks
    Hassan, Mohamed Yusuf
    Arman, Hasan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [24] Prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks from simple index tests using a random forest predictive model
    Wang, Min
    Wan, Wen
    Zhao, Yanlin
    COMPTES RENDUS MECANIQUE, 2020, 348 (01): : 3 - 32
  • [25] Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using ANN models: Incorporating porosity, compressional wave velocity, and schmidt hammer data
    Asteris, Panagiotis G.
    Karoglou, Maria
    Skentou, Athanasia D.
    Vasconcelos, Graca
    He, Mingming
    Bakolas, Asterios
    Zhou, Jian
    Armaghani, Danial Jahed
    ULTRASONICS, 2024, 141
  • [26] Comparison of models for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of some sedimentary rocks from Qom Formation
    Jalali, Seyed Hossein
    Heidari, Mojtaba
    Mohseni, Hassan
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (22)
  • [27] New approach for assessing uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using measurement from nanoindentation experiments
    Komadja, Gbetoglo Charles
    Stanislas, Tido Tiwa
    Munganyinka, Pauline
    Anye, Vitalis
    Pradhan, Sarada Prasad
    Adebayo, Babatunde
    Onwualu, Azikiwe Peter
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 81 (08)
  • [28] Application of Various Nonlinear Models to Predict the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Weakly Cemented Jurassic Rocks
    Wang, Zhenkang
    Li, Wenping
    Chen, Jiangfeng
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (01) : 371 - 384
  • [29] Utilizing several multivariable mathematical and M5P-tree models to predict uniaxial compressive strength of rocks
    Ali, Hunar Farid Hama
    MULTISCALE AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODELING EXPERIMENTS AND DESIGN, 2024, 7 (03) : 1737 - 1753
  • [30] Application of Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Soft Sedimentary Rocks at Thar Coalfield
    Shahani, Niaz Muhammad
    Kamran, Muhammad
    Zheng, Xigui
    Liu, Cancan
    Guo, Xiaowei
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021