Biomechanical effectiveness of controlled ankle motion boots: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:2
作者
Stolycia, Mason L. [1 ]
Lunn, David E. [1 ,2 ]
Stanier, Will [3 ]
Walker, Josh [1 ]
Wilkins, Richard A. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Carnegie Sch Sport, Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QT, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Biomed Res Ctr, Leeds, England
[3] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Physiotherapy Dept, Leeds, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Rheumat & Musculoskeletal Med, Leeds, England
[5] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Podiatry Dept, Leeds, England
关键词
Achilles tendon; function; orthotic walker; rehabilitation; MANAGEMENT; WALKING; KNEE; GAIT; PRESSURES; INJURIES; FORCE; HIP;
D O I
10.1002/jfa2.12044
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Controlled ankle motion (CAM) boots are a below-knee orthotic device prescribed for the management of foot and ankle injuries to reduce ankle range of motion (RoM) and offload the foot and ankle whilst allowing continued ambulation during recovery. There is a lack of clarity within the current literature surrounding the biomechanical understanding and effectiveness of CAM boots. Aims: To summarise the biomechanical effects of CAM boot wear as an orthotic for restricting ankle RoM and offloading the foot. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All papers were independently screened by two authors for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis of all eligible papers was produced. Results: Thirteen studies involving 197 participants (113 male and 84 female) were included. All studies were quasi-randomised and employed a within-study design, of which 12 studies included a control group and a range of CAM boots were investigated. CAM boots can be seen to restrict ankle RoM, however, neighboring joints such as the knee and hip do have kinetic and kinematic compensatory alterations. Plantar pressure of the forefoot is effectively redistributed to the hindfoot by CAM boots. Conclusion: The compensatory mechanisms at the hip and knee joint during CAM boot wear could explain the secondary site pain often reported in patients, specifically at the ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. Although CAM boots can be used to restrict ankle motion, this review has highlighted a lack of in-boot kinematic analyses during CAM boot use, where tracking markers are placed on the anatomical structure rather than on the boot, or through video fluoroscopy, urging the need for a more robust methodological approach to achieve this. There is a need for studies to assess the biomechanical alterations caused by CAM boots in populations living with foot and ankle pathologies. Future research, adopting a longitudinal study design, is required to fully understand the effectiveness of CAM boots for rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Part II: presentation, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and prevention of stress fractures in female athletes [J].
Abbott, Alexandra ;
Bird, Mackenzie ;
Brown, Symone M. ;
Wild, Emily ;
Stewart, Greg ;
Mulcahey, Mary K. .
PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2020, 48 (01) :25-32
[2]   Non-operative functional treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: The Leicester Achilles Management Protocol (LAMP) [J].
Aujla, Randeep S. ;
Patel, Shakil ;
Jones, Annette ;
Bhatia, Maneesh .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (04) :995-999
[3]   Controlled Ankle Movement (CAM) Boot Provides Improved Outcomes With Lower Complications Than Short Leg Walking Cast in Low-energy Pediatric Lateral Ankle Injuries: A Prospective, Randomized Study [J].
Beck, Jennifer J. ;
Kang, Victoria ;
Bennett, Abbie ;
Bloom, Summer ;
Jackson, Nicholas J. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 43 (07) :418-423
[4]   Randomised controlled trial comparing immobilisation in above-knee plaster of Paris to controlled ankle motion boots in undisplaced paediatric spiral tibial fractures [J].
Bradman, Kate ;
Stannage, Katherine ;
O'Brien, Sharon ;
Green, Simon ;
Bear, Natasha ;
Borland, Meredith .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 38 (08) :600-606
[5]   The independent effects of speed and propulsive force on joint power generation in walking [J].
Browne, Michael G. ;
Franz, Jason R. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 55 :48-55
[6]   The effect of existing and novel walker boot designs on offloading and gait mechanics [J].
Bruening, Dustin A. ;
Huber, Seth C. ;
Parry, Dylan J. ;
Hillier, Andrew R. ;
Hayward, Amy E. Mitchell ;
Grover, Jordan K. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2022, 108
[7]   The Effect of Ankle Joint Immobilization on Lower Limb Venous Flow [J].
Craik, Johnathan D. ;
Clark, Amanda ;
Hendry, James ;
Sott, Andrea H. ;
Hamilton, Paul D. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 36 (01) :18-23
[8]  
Ehrnthaller C., 2022, Pedobarographic Evaluation of Five Commonly Used Orthoses for the Lower Extremity
[9]   Immediate Weight-Bearing after Ankle Fracture Fixation [J].
Firoozabadi, Reza ;
Harnden, Emily ;
Krieg, James C. .
ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 2015
[10]   The Effect of Ankle Foot Orthosis' Design and Degree of Dorsiflexion on Achilles Tendon Biomechanics-Tendon Displacement, Lower Leg Muscle Activation, and Plantar Pressure During Walking [J].
Froberg, Asa ;
Martensson, Mattias ;
Arndt, Anton .
FRONTIERS IN SPORTS AND ACTIVE LIVING, 2020, 2