Active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer: Role of multiparametric MRI and cancer progression predictors

被引:0
|
作者
Simforoosh, Nasser [1 ]
Dadpour, Mehdi [1 ]
Narouie, Behzad [2 ]
Madani, Mohammad Hamidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Urol & Nephrol, Shahid Labbafinejad Med Ctr, Ctr Excellence Urol,Urol & Nephrol Res Ctr, 9th Boostan,Pasdaran Ave, Tehran 1666311111, Iran
[2] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Zahedan, Iran
关键词
Prostate neoplasm; active surveillance; cohort study; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; FOLLOW-UP; WORLDWIDE; MEN;
D O I
10.1177/03915603251322577
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of active surveillance (AS) strategy for patients with favorable risk prostate cancer (PCa) and identify multiparametric MRI role and PCa progression predictors.Method: This was a 5-year follow-up cohort study which enrolled 153 favorable-risk PCa patients in an AS program from April 2017 to February 2023. Patients were included in this study based on AS protocol inclusion criteria. MpMRI was also a part of this protocol. Active surveillance outcomes such as adherence to AS treatment strategy and the oncologic outcomes were assessed.Results: During the 4.23 +/- 0.5 years follow-up, 39 of 153 patients left the AS protocol by their own decision (14) or other physicians' advice, due to the concern of cancer progression; 5 of 153 died from another cause other than PCa; 9 of 153 revealed cancer progression during this time and underwent radical prostatectomy; The remaining 100 patients stayed on the AS protocol during the follow up. Adherence to AS strategy protocol was 60.55% in our study. Older age, positive family history for PCa, initial clinical stage, higher total PSA, greater PSA density, more positive cores, and greater core involvement were the most common predictors for progression. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mpMRI for cancer progression detection were 55.55%, 97%, 62.25%, and 96%, respectively.Conclusion: AS can be a suitable alternative treatment for low-risk and very low risk prostate cancer to avoid the probable complications of radical prostatectomy. MpMRI is valid and reliable for identifying PCa progression and provides useful information when combined with biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 287
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [32] The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Modeling Study
    Patel, Sejal
    Rongen, Jan J.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Boltyenkov, Artem
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (06): : 476 - 483
  • [33] Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Vos, Larissa J.
    Janoski, Michele
    Wachowicz, Keith
    Yahya, Atiyah
    Boychak, Oleksandr
    Amanie, John
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Parliament, Matthew B.
    Pituskin, Edith
    Fallone, B. Gino
    Usmani, Nawaid
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 8 (04): : 410 - 418
  • [34] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Bul, Meelan
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Pickles, Tom
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Jenster, Guido
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Bellardita, Lara
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Parker, Chris
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Emberton, Mark
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Lane, Janet A.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Semjonow, Axel
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 85 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [35] Management of low risk prostate cancer: active surveillance and focal therapy
    Klotz, Laurence
    Emberton, Mark
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 270 - 279
  • [36] Super active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer | Opinion: No
    Ghodoussipour, Saum
    Lebastchi, Amir
    Pinto, Peter
    Berger, Andre
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (02): : 215 - 219
  • [37] Active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer
    Bozkurt, Ozan
    Demir, Omer
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [38] Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer
    Lellig, K.
    Beyer, B.
    Graefen, M.
    Zaak, D.
    Stief, C.
    UROLOGE, 2014, 53 (07): : 1031 - 1039
  • [39] Predictors of adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy specimen in men initially enrolled in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bjornebo, Lars
    Olsson, Henrik
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Jaderling, Fredrik
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Eklund, Martin
    Lantz, Anna
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1797 - 1804
  • [40] Adherence to Active Surveillance Protocols for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Initiative
    Kalapara, Arveen A.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Fahey, Michael
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Lee, Lui Shiong
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Harkin, Tim
    Helleman, Jozien
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (01): : 80 - 91