Transperineal prostate biopsy without routine antibiotics demonstrates decreased infection risk

被引:0
|
作者
Lichtbroun, Benjamin J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Patel, Mann [3 ]
Consalvo, Alexis [3 ]
Khizir, Labeeqa [3 ]
Said, Munisa [3 ]
Chien, Austin [3 ]
Chua, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfail, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Passarelli, Rachel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Packiam, Vignesh T. [1 ,2 ]
Golombos, David [1 ,2 ]
Elsamra, Sammy [3 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
Srivastava, Arnav [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ghodoussipour, Saum [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Div Dow Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
transperineal; transrectal; prostate biopsy; antibiotic stewardship; sepsis; bowel preparation; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.32604/cju.2025.064701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Infections are the most feared complication of transrectal prostate biopsies, along with growing concerns of antibiotic resistance. Our institution transitioned to a transperineal approach without use of perioperative antibiotics or bowel preparations. We aimed to compare the safety outcomes associated with transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy techniques. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies at our institution from 2019-2022 was performed. Results: We identified 319 patients-174 transrectal and 145 transperineal. 8 patients who had transperineal biopsy (5.5%) received peri-operative antibiotics, compared to 100% with transrectal biopsy. 35.86% of transperineal patients received a bowel preparation, compared to 100% in the transrectal group. 44.14% and 49.43% of patients received a prior prostate biopsy in the transperineal and transrectal groups, respectively. Patients in the transperineal biopsy group had zero infectious complications, 1 ER visit, and zero 30-day readmissions. This is compared to 9 infectious complications (5.17%, p = 0.005), 8 ER visits (4.60%, p = 0.036), and 7 30-day readmissions (4.02%, p = 0.015) in the transrectal group. Conclusions: In a single institution series, patients undergoing transperineal biopsy had fewer infectious complications compared to those undergoing transrectal biopsy. Despite only a small percentage of patients receiving perioperative antibiotics and a majority of patients not receiving a bowel preparation in the transperineal group, there were zero infectious complications or 30-day readmissions. With greater infectious complications with transrectal biopsy and growing antibiotic resistance, we underline the safety of transperineal prostate biopsy which can largely be done without perioperative antibiotics or a bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparisons of efficacy and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy with or without antibiotic prophylaxis
    He, Junwei
    Guo, Zhenlang
    Huang, Yanqin
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Huang, Lijuan
    Li, Baimou
    Bai, Zunguang
    Wang, Shusheng
    Xiang, Songtao
    Gu, Chiming
    Pan, Jun
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (05) : 191.e9 - 191.e14
  • [42] Catheterization Before Transperineal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy and the Risk of Urethrorrhagia
    Liu, He-qian
    Ding, Wei
    Tao, Ling-song
    Shen, Xu-dong
    Wang, Jia-wei
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 23 - 28
  • [43] Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in patients at high risk
    Igel, TC
    Knight, MK
    Young, PR
    Wehle, MJ
    Petrou, SP
    Broderick, GA
    Marino, R
    Parra, RO
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05): : 1575 - 1579
  • [44] Randomized trial of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy to prevent infection complications.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Vickers, Andrew
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Ristau, Benjamin T.
    Green, David
    Han, Misop
    Rezaee, Michael
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Kowalczyk, Keith
    Ross, Ashley
    Kundu, Shilajit
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Wang, Gerald J.
    Graham, John N.
    Assel, Melissa
    Schaeffer, Anthony J.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 261 - 261
  • [45] Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in, patients at high risk for prostate cancer: An update
    Igel, TC
    Pinkstaff, DM
    Young, PR
    Wehle, MJ
    Petrou, SP
    Broderick, GA
    Parra, RO
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 334 - 335
  • [46] Transperineal prostate biopsy should be considered for patients undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer
    Moran, D.
    Mcloughlin, L.
    Inder, S.
    Lynch, T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 : 27 - 27
  • [47] Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in patients at high risk for prostate cancer: An update
    Igel, TC
    Pinkstaff, DM
    Broderick, GA
    Petrou, SP
    Wehle, MJ
    Young, PR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 118 - 118
  • [48] Image intensifier-guided transperineal prostate biopsy for patients without a rectum: novel technique
    McNicholas, Daniel P.
    Parr, Nigel J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (04) : 487 - 490
  • [49] Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in patients at high risk - Comment
    Presti, JC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05): : 1579 - 1579
  • [50] Comparison of Urinary Tract Infection Rates Between Transperineal Prostate Biopsies with and Without Prophylactic Antibiotics: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cho, Seok
    Jun, Dae Young
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Jeong, Jae Yong
    Jung, Hae Do
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (02):