Effort Expenditure Decreases Risk Aversion When Dealing With Gains but Not Losses

被引:0
|
作者
Dora, Jonas [1 ]
Inzlicht, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
effort; paradox; discounting; risk aversion; prospect theory; GOAL ORIENTATION; DECISION-MAKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; DOPAMINE;
D O I
10.1525/collabra.130886
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Separate lines of research suggest that people tend to avoid mental effort, but also value it. Evidence for this effort paradox in the same context is scarce. We tested whether people discount effort prior to the investment of effort and value effort following its investment. In three preregistered experiments (total N = 450), participants repeatedly chose between executing a low-effort task for a small reward and a high-effort task for a larger reward. Participants then chose whether or not to gamble with their rewards. As people tend to become more risk averse as subjective value increases, we reasoned participants would be less likely to gamble with rewards the harder they had to work for them. In Studies 1 and 2, we framed the experiment in terms of gaining rewards. In Study 3, we framed the experiment in terms of losing rewards. In all three studies, effort was discounted prospectively, meaning people demanded higher rewards to invest more effort. Contrary to our predictions, we found that people were more likely to gamble with the rewards the more effort it required to obtain them, but only when the rewards were framed in terms of gains (Studies 1 and 2). Collectively, these results suggest that any potential effort paradox is unlikely to occur when people are aware of the association between investing effort and gaining rewards. Our results also imply a novel hypothesis, namely that the aversive feeling accompanying effort might motivate people to engage in risky behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Third-party decision-making under risk as a function of prior gains and losses
    Vermeer, Annabel B. Losecaat
    Boksem, Maarten A. S.
    Sanfey, Alan G.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 77
  • [42] Individual Differences in Loss Aversion: Conscientiousness Predicts How Life Satisfaction Responds to Losses Versus Gains in Income
    Boyce, Christopher J.
    Wood, Alex M.
    Ferguson, Eamonn
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (04) : 471 - 484
  • [43] Identifying shipowners' risk attitudes over gains and losses: Evidence from the dry bulk freight market
    Giamouzi, Maria
    Nomikos, Nikos K.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2021, 145
  • [44] Coordination of VMI supply chain with replenishment tactic under risk aversion and sales effort
    Jing Liu
    Fuyou Huang
    Chao Ma
    4OR, 2021, 19 : 389 - 414
  • [45] Dealing with Bad Risk in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: The Cost-Effectiveness Risk-Aversion Curve
    Sendi, Pedram
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [46] Coordination of VMI supply chain with replenishment tactic under risk aversion and sales effort
    Liu, Jing
    Huang, Fuyou
    Ma, Chao
    4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (03): : 389 - 414
  • [47] Acceptance of Mixed Gambles Is Sensitive to the Range of Gains and Losses Experienced, and Estimates of Lambda (λ) Are Not a Reliable Measure of Loss Aversion: Reply to Andre and de Langhe (2020) REPLY
    Walasek, Lukasz
    Mullett, Timothy L.
    Stewart, Neil
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2021, 150 (12) : 2666 - 2670
  • [48] Selective insensitivity for losses but not gains in decision making under risk among the poor
    Ronzani, P.
    Savadori, L.
    Folloni, G.
    Mittone, L.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 77 : 96 - 106
  • [49] Blunted neural response to gains versus losses associated with both risk-prone and risk-averse behavior in a clinically diverse sample
    Huggins, Ashley A.
    Weinberg, Anna
    Gorka, Stephanie M.
    Shankman, Stewart A.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (06)
  • [50] Hyposensitivity to losses under risk but hypersensitivity to gains under ambiguity during feedback evaluation
    Zhao, Jianbiao
    Li, Qi
    Yang, Wendeng
    Zheng, Ya
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 196