Effort Expenditure Decreases Risk Aversion When Dealing With Gains but Not Losses

被引:0
|
作者
Dora, Jonas [1 ]
Inzlicht, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
effort; paradox; discounting; risk aversion; prospect theory; GOAL ORIENTATION; DECISION-MAKING; PROSPECT-THEORY; DOPAMINE;
D O I
10.1525/collabra.130886
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Separate lines of research suggest that people tend to avoid mental effort, but also value it. Evidence for this effort paradox in the same context is scarce. We tested whether people discount effort prior to the investment of effort and value effort following its investment. In three preregistered experiments (total N = 450), participants repeatedly chose between executing a low-effort task for a small reward and a high-effort task for a larger reward. Participants then chose whether or not to gamble with their rewards. As people tend to become more risk averse as subjective value increases, we reasoned participants would be less likely to gamble with rewards the harder they had to work for them. In Studies 1 and 2, we framed the experiment in terms of gaining rewards. In Study 3, we framed the experiment in terms of losing rewards. In all three studies, effort was discounted prospectively, meaning people demanded higher rewards to invest more effort. Contrary to our predictions, we found that people were more likely to gamble with the rewards the more effort it required to obtain them, but only when the rewards were framed in terms of gains (Studies 1 and 2). Collectively, these results suggest that any potential effort paradox is unlikely to occur when people are aware of the association between investing effort and gaining rewards. Our results also imply a novel hypothesis, namely that the aversive feeling accompanying effort might motivate people to engage in risky behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-Control Moderates Decision-Making Behavior When Minimizing Losses versus Maximizing Gains
    Pang, Bo
    Otto, A. Ross
    Worthy, Darrell A.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 28 (02) : 176 - 187
  • [22] Precautionary Effort Investment under Cross Risk Aversion
    Yuqing TAO
    Jie MEI
    Wen CHENG
    Sijie ZOU
    JournalofSystemsScienceandInformation, 2019, 7 (04) : 344 - 358
  • [23] DISTORTION RISK MEASURES, AMBIGUITY AVERSION AND OPTIMAL EFFORT
    Robert, Christian Y.
    Therond, Pierre-E
    ASTIN BULLETIN, 2014, 44 (02): : 277 - 302
  • [24] A neuropsychological approach to understanding risk-taking for potential gains and losses
    Levin, Irwin P.
    Xue, Gui
    Weller, Joshua A.
    Reimann, Martin
    Lauriola, Marco
    Bechara, Antoine
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [25] Your money and your life: Risk attitudes over gains and losses
    Oliver, Adam
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2018, 57 (01) : 29 - 50
  • [26] Delay discounting of monetary gains and losses in adolescents with ADHD: Contribution of delay aversion to choice
    Mies, Gabry W.
    de Water, Erik
    Wiersema, Jan R.
    Scheres, Anouk
    CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 25 (04) : 528 - 547
  • [27] Your money and your life: Risk attitudes over gains and losses
    Adam Oliver
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2018, 57 : 29 - 50
  • [28] Risk and risk aversion when states of nature matter
    Jan Werner
    Economic Theory, 2009, 41 : 231 - 246
  • [29] Risk and risk aversion when states of nature matter
    Werner, Jan
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 41 (02) : 231 - 246
  • [30] When does aggregation reduce risk aversion?
    Chambers, Christopher P.
    Echenique, Federico
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2012, 76 (02) : 582 - 595