The role of phenology in crop yield prediction: Comparison of ground-based phenology and remotely sensed phenology

被引:4
作者
Pei, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Shaofeng [1 ]
Zou, Yaopeng [1 ]
Liao, Chunhua [1 ,2 ]
He, Yinan [3 ]
Wang, Jian [4 ]
Huang, Huabing [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tianxing [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Haifeng [5 ]
Fang, Huajun [6 ,7 ]
Wang, Li [8 ]
Huang, Jianxi [9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geospatial Engn & Sci, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Nat Resources Monitoring Trop & Subtrop Ar, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[5] Henan Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Henan Int Joint Lab Geospatial Technol, Kaifeng 475004, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[7] Zhongke Jian Inst Ecoenvironm Sci, Jian 343000, Peoples R China
[8] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[9] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Engn, Chengdu 611756, Peoples R China
[10] China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[11] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Remote Sensing Agrihazards, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crop yield prediction; Remote sensing; Machine learning; Temporal windows; Food security; CORN GRAIN-YIELD; TEMPERATURE; MODEL; VEGETATION; MAIZE; FORECASTS; PATTERNS; WHEAT; BELT;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110340
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Precise and timely crop yield predictions at large scales are crucial for safeguarding global food security. A key factor in accurate yield forecasting is the integration of multi-source environmental data, where the choice of time windows for aggregating these variables plays a pivotal role. Segmenting time windows by phenological stages allows for more precise extraction of environmental variables, capturing the complex interactions between crop development and external factors. However, the effectiveness of this approach in improving yield prediction accuracy, especially when comparing ground-based and remote sensing-derived land surface phenology data, remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigate how phenology-based time windows affect corn yield predictions, using machine learning algorithms and multi-source environmental data from the U.S. Corn Belt. We systematically analyzed and compared models incorporating either ground-based or land surface phenology. By segmenting the growing season into six crucial stages (BBCH 00-99) and formulating specific yield forecasting models for each stage, we determined the optimal lead times for predictions utilizing both sources of phenological data. Our findings suggested that the incorporation of phenology-derived crop growth windows significantly enhances the accuracy of yield prediction by approximately 10 % compared to the fixed-season method. Ground-based phenology data from the USDA crop progress report slightly outperformed MODIS-based land surface phenology data, achieved the highest accuracy with the XGBoost model (R2 = 0.668, RMSE = 1.09 t/ha, MAE = 0.84 t/ha). Furthermore, this study demonstrated that reliable corn yield predictions could be made as early as the second phenological stage (Emerged-Silking for ground phenology, MidGreenup-Maturity for MODIS phenology). In regions where ground observations are limited or unavailable, land surface phenology emerges as a promising alternative. This study presents a robust framework for precise and extensive crop yield modeling and early prediction, which is crucial for making informed agricultural decisions and ensuring food security.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CROP SPECIES CLASSIFICATION: A PHENOLOGY BASED APPROACH
    Luciani, R.
    Laneve, G.
    Jahjah, M.
    Collins, M.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2017, : 4390 - 4393
  • [22] Thermal indices in relation to crop phenology and fruit yield of apple
    Singh, Mohan
    Bhatia, H. S.
    MAUSAM, 2012, 63 (03): : 449 - 454
  • [23] Remotely sensed carotenoid dynamics improve modelling photosynthetic phenology in conifer and deciduous forests
    Wong, Christopher Y. S.
    Mercado, Lina M.
    Arain, M. Altaf
    Ensminger, Ingo
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2022, 321
  • [24] Environmental Forcings on the Remotely Sensed Phytoplankton Bloom Phenology in the Central Ross Sea Polynya
    Park, Jinku
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Kim, Hyun-cheol
    Hwang, Jihyun
    Jo, Young-Heon
    Lee, Sang Heon
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2019, 124 (08) : 5400 - 5417
  • [25] Phytoplankton phenology in algerian continental shelf and slope waters using remotely sensed data
    Benzouai, Siham
    Louanchi, Ferial
    Smara, Youcef
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2020, 247
  • [26] MODIS-based corn grain yield estimation model incorporating crop phenology information
    Sakamoto, Toshihiro
    Gitelson, Anatoly A.
    Arkebauer, Timothy J.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 131 : 215 - 231
  • [27] Validating remotely sensed land surface phenology with leaf out records from a citizen science network
    Purdy, Logan M.
    Sang, Zihaohan
    Beaubien, Elisabeth
    Hamann, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2023, 116
  • [28] Remotely sensed assessment of urbanization effects on vegetation phenology in China's 32 major cities
    Zhou, Decheng
    Zhao, Shuqing
    Zhang, Liangxia
    Liu, Shuguang
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 176 : 272 - 281
  • [29] Phenology-Based Remote Sensing Assessment of Crop Water Productivity
    Gao, Hongsi
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Wang, Xiugui
    Zeng, Yuhong
    WATER, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [30] Using PhenoCams to track crop phenology and explain the effects of different cropping systems on yield
    Liu, Yujie
    Bachofen, Christoph
    Wittwer, Raphael
    Duarte, Gicele Silva
    Sun, Qing
    Klaus, Valentin H.
    Buchmann, Nina
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 195