A competency framework for simulation facilitation in low-resource settings: a modified Delphi study

被引:4
作者
Mossenson, Adam I. [1 ,2 ]
Livingston, Patricia [3 ]
Brown, Janie A. [4 ,5 ]
Khalid, Karima [6 ]
Rubio Martinez, Rodrigo [7 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Med, Perth, Australia
[2] St John God Midland Publ & Private Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Anesthesia Pain Management & Perioperat Care, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Muhimbili Univ Hlth & Allied Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[7] ABC Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Mexico City, Mexico
关键词
assessment; competencies; facilitation; low-resource settings; simulation; HEALTH-CARE SIMULATION; EDUCATION; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1111/anae.16446
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundSkilled facilitators are essential to drive effective simulation training in healthcare. Competency-based frameworks support the development of facilitation skills but, to our knowledge, there are no frameworks that specifically address context-sensitive priorities developed with practitioners working in low-resource settings.MethodsWe aimed to develop a core competency framework for healthcare simulation facilitation in low-resource settings using a modified Delphi process. We drew on the domain expertise of members of the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Community of Practice, with the study guided by a four-member steering group experienced in the conduct of simulation in low-resource settings. In survey round 1, participants (n = 54) were presented with an initial competency set derived from a previous qualitative study and co-created a set of 57 competencies for effective simulation facilitation in low-resource settings. In survey round 2, participants (n = 52) ranked competencies by relevance into three performance categories: techniques; artistry; and values. In survey round 3, participants (n = 50) ranked competencies on their importance. The steering group collated results and presented a draft core competency framework. In survey round 4, participants (n = 50) voted with 98% agreement that this framework represented the most relevant and important competencies for effective facilitation of simulation sessions in low-resource settings.ResultsThe final 32-item framework encompasses core competencies found in existing standards and includes important new concepts such as demonstration of cultural sensitivity; humility; ability to recognise and respond to potential language barriers; facilitation team collaboration; awareness of logistics; and contingency planning.DiscussionThis competency-based framework highlights specific practices required for effective simulation facilitation in low-resource settings. Further work is required to refine and validate this tool to train simulation facilitators to deliver effective training to improve patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / 1308
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Healthcare Simulation in Resource-Limited Regions and Global Health Applications [J].
Andreatta, Pamela .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 12 (03) :135-138
[2]   Context Matters: Factors Affecting Implementation of Simulation Training in Nursing and Midwifery Schools in North America, Africa and Asia [J].
Baayd, Jami ;
Heins, Zoe ;
Walker, Dilys ;
Afulani, Patience ;
Sterling, Mona ;
Sanders, Jessica N. ;
Cohen, Susanna .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2023, 75 :1-10
[3]   Reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines: a protocol for a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library [J].
Banno, Masahiro ;
Tsujimoto, Yasushi ;
Kataoka, Yuki .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04)
[4]   A Conceptual Framework for the Development of Debriefing Skills A Journey of Discovery, Growth, and Maturity [J].
Cheng, Adam ;
Eppich, Walter ;
Kolbe, Michaela ;
Meguerdichian, Michael ;
Bajaj, Komal ;
Grant, Vincent .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2020, 15 (01) :55-60
[5]   Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cheng, Adam ;
Eppich, Walter ;
Grant, Vincent ;
Sherbino, Jonathan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Cook, David A. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 48 (07) :657-666
[6]   Social influence: Compliance and conformity [J].
Cialdini, RB ;
Goldstein, NJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 :591-621
[7]   Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice™ The Debriefing Process [J].
Decker, Sharon ;
Alinier, Guillaume ;
Crawford, Scott B. ;
Gordon, Randy M. ;
Jenkins, Deborah ;
Wilson, Cheryl .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2021, 58 :27-32
[8]   Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies [J].
Diamond, Ivan R. ;
Grant, Robert C. ;
Feldman, Brian M. ;
Pencharz, Paul B. ;
Ling, Simon C. ;
Moore, Aideen M. ;
Wales, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) :401-409
[9]  
Diaz-Londono Cesar, 2024, IECON 2024 - 50th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, P1, DOI 10.1109/IECON55916.2024.10905629
[10]  
DiazNavarro C., 2024, INT J HEALTHC SIMUL, P1, DOI [10.54531/nyvm5886, DOI 10.54531/NYVM5886]