Differences between valve types in anatomic changes of the aortic root after surgical aortic valve replacement

被引:0
作者
Kawamura, Ai [1 ]
Shimamura, Kazuo [1 ]
Yoshioka, Daisuke [1 ]
Misumi, Yusuke [1 ]
Yamashita, Kizuku [1 ]
Maed, Koichi [1 ]
Kawamura, Takuji [1 ]
Kawamura, Masashi [1 ]
Matsuhiro, Yutaka [2 ]
Kosugi, Shumpei [2 ]
Nakamura, Daisuke [2 ]
Mizote, Isamu [2 ]
Sakata, Yasushi [2 ]
Miyagawa, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Cardiol, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
关键词
changes in the aortic root anatomy after surgical aortic valve replacement; TAV-in-SAV feasibility; coro- nary obstruction; CORONARY OBSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.07.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: When transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) is considered as a secondary interventional option, it is desirable to estimate the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV before the initial surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), for which knowledge of the anatomic changes after SAVR is essential. We investigated the changes in the aortic root and evaluated the differences in changes between valve types. Methods: Pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 124 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent SAVR with various bioprosthetic valves were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative aortic root changes and parameters related to future TAV-in-SAV were compared between the sutured valve group and rapiddeployment/sutureless valve group. Results: After SAVR, the coronary height in the sutured valve group and rapiddeployment/sutureless valve group was shortened by a median of 4.6 to 5.3 mm and 0.5 to 2.2 mm, respectively, and the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) diameter was reduced by a median of 1.6 to 2.7 mm and 0.1 to 1.3 mm, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the rapid deployment/sutureless valve group had a coronary orifice (especially in the right coronary artery) above the risk plane. The valve-to-coronary distance and valve-to-aorta distance (VTA) were adequate in most patients. The only difference between the groups was in the left VTA. Conclusions: Decreases in coronary height and SOV diameter were observed after SAVR, especially in the sutured valve group. The aortic root structure was better preserved in the rapid-deployment/sutureless valve group. This may be advantageous for future TAV-in-SAV. These results are important for considering the feasibility of future TAV-in-SAV. (JTCVS Techniques 2024;27:51-9)
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Aortic Valve Replacement: Differences Between Biological and Mechanical Prostheses
    Timmermans, Naomi
    Lam, Ka Yan
    van Straten, Albert
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Soliman-Hamad, Mohamed
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2024, 33 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [42] Impact of Valve Size on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch and Aortic Valve Gradient After Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Aalaei-Andabili, Seyed Hossein
    Lee, Teng C.
    Waheed, Nida
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    Petersen, John W.
    Wayangankar, Siddharth
    Arnaoutakis, George J.
    Anderson, R. David
    Beaver, Thomas M.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 14 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [43] Prediction of Surgical Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement
    Mistiaen, W.
    Van Cauwelaert, Ph.
    Muylaert, Ph.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2012, 112 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [44] Life Expectancy After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Martinsson, Andreas
    Nielsen, Susanne J.
    Milojevic, Milan
    Redfors, Bjorn
    Omerovic, Elmir
    Tonnessen, Theis
    Gudbjartsson, Tomas
    Dellgren, Goran
    Jeppsson, Anders
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (22) : 2147 - 2157
  • [45] AKI after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Srivali, Narat
    Harrison, Andrew M.
    Gunderson, Tina M.
    Kittanamongkolchai, Wonngarm
    Greason, Kevin L.
    Kashani, Kianoush B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 27 (06): : 1854 - 1860
  • [46] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmed, Adham
    Levy, Kenneth H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (07) : 2486 - 2495
  • [47] Aortic Root Imaging in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Escobedo, Carlos
    Schoenhagen, Paul
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2013, 66 (11): : 839 - 841
  • [48] Sex Differences in Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Humphries, Karin H.
    Toggweiler, Stefan
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Dumont, Eric
    Wood, David A.
    Willson, Alexander B.
    Binder, Ronald K.
    Freeman, Melanie
    Lee, May K.
    Gao, Min
    Izadnegahdar, Mona
    Ye, Jian
    Cheung, Anson
    Webb, John G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (10) : 882 - 886
  • [49] Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement
    Deharo, Pierre
    Bisson, Arnaud
    Herbert, Julien
    Lacour, Thibaud
    Saint Etienne, Christophe
    Porto, Alizee
    Theron, Alexis
    Collart, Frederic
    Bourguignon, Thierry
    Cuisset, Thomas
    Fauchier, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (05) : 489 - 499
  • [50] Failing stentless aortic valves: redo aortic root replacement or valve in a valve?
    Finch, Jonathan
    Roussin, Isabelle
    Pepper, John
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (03) : 495 - 504