Differences between valve types in anatomic changes of the aortic root after surgical aortic valve replacement

被引:0
作者
Kawamura, Ai [1 ]
Shimamura, Kazuo [1 ]
Yoshioka, Daisuke [1 ]
Misumi, Yusuke [1 ]
Yamashita, Kizuku [1 ]
Maed, Koichi [1 ]
Kawamura, Takuji [1 ]
Kawamura, Masashi [1 ]
Matsuhiro, Yutaka [2 ]
Kosugi, Shumpei [2 ]
Nakamura, Daisuke [2 ]
Mizote, Isamu [2 ]
Sakata, Yasushi [2 ]
Miyagawa, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Cardiol, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
关键词
changes in the aortic root anatomy after surgical aortic valve replacement; TAV-in-SAV feasibility; coro- nary obstruction; CORONARY OBSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.07.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: When transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) is considered as a secondary interventional option, it is desirable to estimate the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAV-in-SAV before the initial surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), for which knowledge of the anatomic changes after SAVR is essential. We investigated the changes in the aortic root and evaluated the differences in changes between valve types. Methods: Pre- and post-SAVR computed tomography scans of 124 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent SAVR with various bioprosthetic valves were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative aortic root changes and parameters related to future TAV-in-SAV were compared between the sutured valve group and rapiddeployment/sutureless valve group. Results: After SAVR, the coronary height in the sutured valve group and rapiddeployment/sutureless valve group was shortened by a median of 4.6 to 5.3 mm and 0.5 to 2.2 mm, respectively, and the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) diameter was reduced by a median of 1.6 to 2.7 mm and 0.1 to 1.3 mm, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the rapid deployment/sutureless valve group had a coronary orifice (especially in the right coronary artery) above the risk plane. The valve-to-coronary distance and valve-to-aorta distance (VTA) were adequate in most patients. The only difference between the groups was in the left VTA. Conclusions: Decreases in coronary height and SOV diameter were observed after SAVR, especially in the sutured valve group. The aortic root structure was better preserved in the rapid-deployment/sutureless valve group. This may be advantageous for future TAV-in-SAV. These results are important for considering the feasibility of future TAV-in-SAV. (JTCVS Techniques 2024;27:51-9)
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Zhang, Xinlin
    Xu, Biao
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 166 (08) : 605 - 605
  • [32] Early readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement
    Vejpongsa, Pimprapa
    Bhise, Viraj
    Charitakis, Konstantinos
    Anderson, H. Vernon
    Balan, Prakash
    Nguyen, Tom C.
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    Smalling, Richard W.
    Dhoble, Abhijeet
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (04) : 662 - 670
  • [33] Changing Surgical Aortic Valve Size and Choices in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era
    Gertz, Zachary M.
    Strobel, Raymond J.
    Wisniewski, Alex M.
    Fonner, Clifford E.
    Speir, Alan
    Teman, Nicholas R.
    Quader, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2023, 2023
  • [34] Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve (VIV) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses Perceval™: A Systematic Review of Published Cases
    Owais, Tamer
    Bisht, Osama
    El Din Moawad, Mostafa Hossam
    El-Garhy, Mohammad
    Stock, Sina
    Girdauskas, Evaldas
    Kuntze, Thomas
    Amer, Mohamed
    Lauten, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (17)
  • [35] Anticoagulation After Surgical or Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
    Chakravarty, Tarun
    Patel, Akshar
    Kapadia, Samir
    Raschpichler, Matthias
    Smalling, Richard W.
    Szeto, Wilson Y.
    Abramowitz, Yigal
    Cheng, Wen
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Hahn, Rebecca T.
    Herrmann, Howard C.
    Kereiakes, Dean
    Svensson, Lars
    Yoon, Sung-Han
    Babaliaros, Vasilis C.
    Kodali, Susheel
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Alu, Maria C.
    Liu, Yangbo
    McAndrew, Thomas
    Mack, Michael
    Leon, Martin B.
    Makkar, Raj R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (09) : 1190 - 1200
  • [36] Commentary: Surgical aortic valve replacement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Is it time to reconsider the lifelong management?
    Bando, Ko
    Ogawa, Takayuki
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (06) : 2024 - 2025
  • [37] Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for mixed aortic valve disease
    Philip, Jennifer L.
    Zens, Tiffany
    Lozonschi, Lucian
    De Oliveira, Nilto C.
    Osaki, Satoru
    Kohmoto, Takushi
    Akhter, Shahab A.
    Tang, Paul C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (07) : 4042 - 4051
  • [38] Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - Between Evidence and Recommendation
    Hagl, Christian
    Rudolph, Tanja
    AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2022, 11 (05) : 419 - 426
  • [39] Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
    van Steenbergen, G. J.
    van Straten, B.
    Lam, K. Y.
    van Veghel, D.
    Dekker, L.
    Tonino, P. A.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (02) : 106 - 112
  • [40] Comparison of Aortic Annulus Dimension After Aortic Valve Neocuspidization With Valve Replacement and Normal Valve
    Yamamoto, Yoshitaka
    Iino, Kenji
    Shintani, Yoshiko
    Kato, Hiroki
    Kimura, Keiichi
    Watanabe, Go
    Takemura, Hirofumi
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 29 (02) : 143 - 149