Learning curve for robot-assisted Mckeown esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

被引:0
作者
Yuan, Ligong [1 ]
Zhang, Tianci [1 ]
Wu, Xianning [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Thorac Surg, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei 230001, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2025年 / 51卷 / 03期
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Robot-assisted; Mckeown;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109516
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is an effective but technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of RAMIE has been studied to help guide training and to ensure its safe implementation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the first 83 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent robot-assisted minimally invasive Mckeown esophagectomy (RAMIE-MK) between May 2021 and August 2023, all performed by a single surgeon. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was applied to generate the learning curve of RAMIE-MK, based on total operation time. Results: The learning curve was divided into two phases based on the CUSUM analysis: Phase I, the initial learning phase (cases 1-27) and Phase II, the proficiency phase (cases 28-83). When comparing the proficiency phase with the initial phase, we observed a significant decreased trends in total operation time (329.6 +/- 71.0 min vs 221.3 +/- 33.5 min, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in other clinicopathological characteristics. Conclusion: For a surgeon experienced in open and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy, and who also received systematic robot-assisted thoracic surgery training on animals, a total of 27 cases were required to gain technical proficiency in RAMIE-MK.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center
    de Groot, E. M.
    Goense, L.
    Kingma, B. F.
    van den Berg, J. W.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 1357 - 1365
  • [2] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Esagian, Stepan M.
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Skarentzos, Konstantinos
    Katsaros, Ioannis
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    Molena, Daniela
    Karamouzis, Michalis V.
    Rouvelas, Ioannis
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [3] Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system
    Hernandez, JD
    Bann, SD
    Munz, Y
    Moorthy, K
    Datta, V
    Martin, S
    Dosis, A
    Bello, F
    Darzi, A
    Rockall, T
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (03): : 372 - 378
  • [4] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Hong, Ziqiang
    Cui, Baiqiang
    Wang, Kai
    Bai, Xiangdou
    Yang, Ning
    Zhang, Yu
    Wu, Xusheng
    Cheng, Tao
    Jin, Dacheng
    Zhao, Jing
    Gou, Yunjiu
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (13) : 8271 - 8277
  • [5] Improving Oncologic Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer After Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Mansour, Alexandra I.
    Reddy, Rishindra M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (09) : 5369 - 5371
  • [6] Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE)
    Mueller, Dolores T.
    Brunner, Stefanie
    Straatman, Jennifer
    Babic, Benjamin
    Eckhoff, Jennifer A.
    Reisewitz, Alissa
    Storms, Christian
    Schiffmann, Lars M.
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 7305 - 7316
  • [7] Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of NSQIP Database
    Naffouje, Samer A.
    Salloum, Rony H.
    Khalaf, Zaynab
    Salti, George I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (07) : 2001 - 2010
  • [8] Learning curve for robotic esophagectomy and dissection of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes for esophageal cancer
    Park, S. Y.
    Kim, D. J.
    Kang, D. R.
    Haam, S. J.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2017, 30 (12):
  • [9] Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre
    Sihag, Smita
    Wright, Cameron D.
    Wain, John C.
    Gaissert, Henning A.
    Lanuti, Michael
    Allan, James S.
    Mathisen, Douglas J.
    Morse, Christopher R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 42 (03) : 430 - 437
  • [10] Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
    Sung, Hyuna
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Siegel, Rebecca L.
    Laversanne, Mathieu
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Bray, Freddie
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (03) : 209 - 249