Distance from cancer facility as a barrier to timely treatment among patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Steele, Ethan M. [1 ]
Robertson, Sharon E. [2 ,3 ]
Holmes, Jordan A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Simon Comprehens Canc Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cervical cancer; Treatment disparity; Time to treat; Distance; National cancer database; Urbanization; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; CARE; DISPARITIES; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; ASSOCIATION; CARCINOMA; VOLUME; STAGE;
D O I
10.22514/ejgo.2024.091
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Globally, cervical cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in women in many countries and in the United States it is the second most common cause of cancer death in younger women age 20-39 years. Distance from treatment facility may contribute to treatment delay and ultimately, disease outcomes. We hypothesize that greater distance from the treating facility results in a treatment delay among women with non-metastatic cervical cancer. Data for 36,986 subjects with non-metastatic cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation or surgery between 2004 and 2015 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Subjects were excluded if they had missing information, variant histology, treatment >180 days from diagnosis, or lived >1000 miles from their facility. Univariate comparisons were performed using chi-square and analysis of variance. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate the effect of distance quartile on time to treatment while adjusting for significant patient and disease characteristics. Results: The mean age was 49.5 years, 16.2% of women were black, 14.2% were Hispanic, 48.7% had private insurance, 98.4% lived in urban/metro counties, and 56.1% received surgery versus radiation as initial treatment. Multivariable analysis identified a treatment delay of 1.1 days for distance quartile 2 (p = 0.008), 2.0 days for quartile 3 (p < 0.001), and 4.0 days for quartile 4 (p < 0.001) compared to women in the closest quartile. Other patient and disease characteristics were significantly associated with treatment delay. Interestingly, women living in rural counties were treated over 8.5 days earlier than those from the most populous metropolitan counties (p <0.001). In conclusion: Greater distance from treatment facility resulted in a statistically significant delay in treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging
    Liu, Ying
    Liu, Haidong
    Bai, Xu
    Ye, Zhaoxiang
    Sun, Haoran
    Bai, Renju
    Wang, Dehua
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [22] Disease-free survival in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer
    Diniz, Roberta Wolp
    Guerra, Maximiliano Ribeiro
    Duarte Cintra, Jane Rocha
    Fayer, Vivian Assis
    Bustamante Teixeira, Maria Teresa
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 62 (05): : 407 - 413
  • [23] Cervical cancer care in rural Virginia: The impact of distance from an academic medical center on outcomes & the role of non-specialized radiation centers
    Rauh, Lisa A.
    Saks, Erin J.
    Nakad-Rodriguez, Diana
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Duska, Linda R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 150 (02) : 338 - 342
  • [24] Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with non-metastatic cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy: A population-based study
    Ke, Yingyue
    Zhang, Zhijia
    Li, Yicheng
    Qin, Yan
    Yang, Qiao
    Zheng, Chengcheng
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (04):
  • [25] Type and dose of radiotherapy used for initial treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer
    Wang, Dian
    Ho, Alex
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Wu, Xiao-Cheng
    Lo, Mary
    Fleming, Steven
    Goodman, Michael
    Thompson, Trevor
    Owen, Jean
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [26] Outcomes of Non-metastatic Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Experience
    Saleem, Abdulaziz M.
    Saber, Wafa
    Alnajashi, Rawan A.
    Alamoudi, Ebtihal A.
    Shilli, Yumn H.
    Aljabarti, Amani M.
    Al-Hajeili, Marwan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [27] Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature
    Ambroggi, Massimo
    Biasini, Claudia
    Del Giovane, Cinzia
    Fornari, Fabio
    Cavanna, Luigi
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (12) : 1378 - 1385
  • [28] Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Operable, Non-Metastatic Oesophageal Cancer
    Fuchs, H. F.
    Hoelscher, A. H.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2014, 139 (01): : 32 - 36
  • [29] Immunotherapy in non-metastatic urothelial cancer: back to the "future'
    Darling, H. S.
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2019, 19 (07) : 685 - 695
  • [30] Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients
    Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan
    Berna Öksüzoğlu
    Nuriye Özdemir
    Sercan Aksoy
    Necati Alkış
    Ayşe Gök
    Mehmet Ali Kaplan
    Mahmut Gümüş
    Veli Berk
    Doğan Uncu
    Meltem Baykara
    Dilşen Çolak
    Ümmügül Üyetürk
    İbrahim Türker
    Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
    Medical Oncology, 2012, 29 : 554 - 560