Abolishing age criterion to determine organ transplant recipients in Israel: A qualitative study of medical staff perceptions

被引:0
作者
Katvan, Eyal [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Korin, Orly [4 ]
Doron, Israel Issi [5 ]
Mor, Eytan [6 ]
Shnoor, Boaz [8 ]
Gelman, Daniel [9 ]
Ashkenazi, Tamar [10 ]
机构
[1] Peres Acad Ctr, Law Sch, Rehovot, Israel
[2] Peres Acad Ctr, Dept Hlth Syst Management, Rehovot, Israel
[3] Bar Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[4] Ariel Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, IL-40700 Ariel, Israel
[5] Univ Haifa, CRSA Ctr Res & Study Aging, Dept Gerontol, Haifa, Israel
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Organ Transplant Ctr, Sheba Med Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
[7] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[8] Acad Coll Law & Sci, Law Sch, Hod Hasharon, Israel
[9] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Dept Mil Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[10] Israel Minist Hlth, Israel Natl Transplant Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Age limit; ageism; organ transplantation; policy change; qualitative; HEART-TRANSPLANTATION; ALLOCATION; ATTITUDES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105197
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Since April 2014 the age limitation on candidates listed for organ transplantation in Israel was abolished following the recommendations of a Public Committee. In this research the new policy was examined in light of scarce medical resources and the increased rate of aging in Israel. Methods: The opinions of twelve medical staff regarding the policy change were analyzed by a qualitative methodology, using semi-structured interviews. Results: Interviews with medical staff members revealed three main themes: 1. positive acceptance of the new policy; 2. concerns and problems regarding the change; and 3. the influence of the policy change on the organ transplant allocation system and patient-doctor relationships. Discussion and Conclusions: The medical staff expressed positive views towards the new policy, based on age-free, individually determined admission to transplant waiting lists. However, some concerns were raised regarding the medical implications of this policy, thus potentially hindering its full application.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ayalon L, 2018, INT PERSPECT AGING, V19, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_1
[2]  
BEAUCHAMP TL, 1989, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[3]  
Callahan D, 1995, A response to my critics
[4]  
Cohen-Almagor R, 2002, ISSUES LAW MED, V17, P247
[5]   Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation [J].
Colvin, Monica M. ;
Smith, Candice A. ;
Tullius, Stefan G. ;
Goldstein, Daniel R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2017, 127 (07) :2523-2529
[6]   Ageism and kidney transplantation [J].
Curtis, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) :1264-1266
[7]   Heart Transplantation in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: A Two-Decade Experience [J].
Daneshvar, D. ;
Czer, L. S. C. ;
Phan, A. ;
Schwarz, E. R. ;
De Robertis, M. ;
Mirocha, J. ;
Rafiei, M. ;
Pixton, J. R. ;
Kass, R. M. ;
Trento, A. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (10) :3851-3856
[8]  
Daniels N., 2007, Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809514
[9]   Age as a Criterion for Setting Priorities in Health Care? A Survey of the German Public View [J].
Diederich, Adele ;
Winkelhage, Jeannette ;
Wirsik, Norman .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08)
[10]   Liver transplantation in elderly patients: what do we know at the beginning of 2020? [J].
Dolnikov, Shimon ;
Adam, Rene ;
Cherqui, Daniel ;
Allard, Marc Antoine .
SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (06) :533-539