Context of assessment in competency-based nursing education: Semi-structured interviews in nursing education institutions in a low-income country

被引:1
作者
Mukurunge, Eva [1 ]
Nyoni, Champion N. [1 ]
Hugo, Lizemari [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, POB 339, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
Assessment; Context; Low-income country; Nursing education; Programmatic assessment; PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106529
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Organisational considerations are essential when proposing the implementation of an educational innovation like programmatic assessment. Currently, most recommendations by regulatory bodies to adopt curriculum reforms do not take into consideration the characteristics and context of low-income countries. This paper explores the contexts of four nursing education institutions in a low-income country that recently adopted the programmatic assessment approach in their programmes. The study was underpinned by the environment phase of the Design Science Research framework and used semi-structured interviews to collect data. Deductive thematic analysis was performed to map the data to three themes: the people; the organisation in terms of culture, structure and strategies; and the state of technology. The results revealed that organisational contexts in terms of the people, the organisation culture, structure and strategies and the state of its technology are essential in the implementation of programmatic assessment. Successful implementation requires a shift in organisational paradigms in terms of assessment cultures while affording maximal support and education to enhance the capabilities of students and educators experiencing the change. Collaboration with other institutions at advanced stages of programmatic assessment implementation is essential. Finally, continuous professional development for all stakeholders is essential for sustainable implementation of the programmatic assessment approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Akala B., 2021, Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, V3, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100107, DOI 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2021.100107]
  • [2] Programmatic assessment design choices in nine programs in higher education
    Baartman, Liesbeth
    van Schilt-Mol, Tamara
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 7
  • [3] Validity evidence for programmatic assessment in competency-based education
    Bok, Harold G. J.
    de Jong, Lubberta H.
    O'Neill, Thomas
    Maxey, Connor
    Hecker, Kent G.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 7 (06) : 362 - 372
  • [4] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [5] Cheptoo R., 2019, Shanlax International Journal of Education, V7, P46, DOI [10.34293/education.v7i4.640, DOI 10.34293/EDUCATION.V7I4.640]
  • [6] Why Don't They Just Keen on Doing It? Understanding the Challenges of the Sustainability of Change
    Clausen, Birgitte
    Kragh, Hanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19 (04) : 221 - 245
  • [7] The Importance of Professional Development in a Programmatic Assessment System: One Medical School's Experience
    Colbert, Colleen Y.
    Bierer, S. Beth
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [8] GARFIELD E, 1974, CURR CONTENTS, P5
  • [9] The Dunning -Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data
    Gignac, Gilles E.
    Zajenkowski, Marcin
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 80
  • [10] Implementation of Programmatic Assessment: Challenges and Lessons Learned
    Govaerts, Marjan
    Van der Vleuten, Cees
    Schut, Suzanne
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (10):