Flow structure in a compound channel: Benchmarking 2D and 3D numerical models

被引：0

作者：

Kimura, I. ^{[1
]}

Bousmar, D. ^{[2
]}

Archambeau, P. ^{[3
]}

Dewals, B. ^{[3
]}

Erpicum, S. ^{[3
]}

Pirotton, M. ^{[3
]}

Li, X. ^{[3
]}

Dordevic, D. ^{[4
]}

Rosic, N. ^{[4
]}

Zindovic, B. ^{[4
]}

Echeverribar, I. ^{[5
]}

Navas Montilla, A. ^{[5
]}

Brufau, P. ^{[5
]}

Garcia Navarro, M. P. ^{[5
]}

de Linares, M. Gonzales ^{[6
]}

Paquier, A. ^{[7
]}

Kopmann, R. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Toyama, Toyama, Japan

[2] Serv Publ Wallonie, Chatelet, Belgium

[3] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium

[4] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

[5] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

[6] Artelia, Echirolles, France

[7] Inrae Riverly, Villeurbanne, France

[8] Fed Waterways Engn & Res Inst, Karlsruhe, Germany

来源：

RIVER FLOW 2022 | 2024年

关键词：

SHALLOW; SIMULATION;

D O I：

10.1201/9781003323037-8

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The benchmarking test of 2D and 3D numerical models on a compound channel flow with a rectangular shaped main channel and a rectangular shaped floodplain was carried out by the IAHR Working Group on Compound Channels. The selected test case is the flume experiment by Nezu and Tominaga (1991). Nine depth-averaged 2D models and four 3D models participated in the benchmark. In the 2D models, the depth averaged streamwise velocity profiles in the lateral direction were compared. In the 3D models, velocity components in three directions as well as the distribution of the turbulence kinetic energy in a cross-section were compared. Through the comparison, the applicability and limitations of each model are highlighted and discussed with regard to the model characteristics.

引用

页码：51 / 60

页数：10

共 50 条

[31] Phenomenological 2D and 3D Models of Ductile Fracture for Girth Weld of X80 Pipeline
Li, Naixian
Jia, Bin
Chen, Junhong
Sheng, Ying
Deng, Songwen
BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (02)
[32] Comparison of 1D, 2D and 3D quench onset simulations
Stenvall, A.
Mikkonen, R.
Kovac, P.
PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 470 (22): : 2047 - 2050
[33] 3D Open Channel Flow Modeling by Applying 1D Adjustment
Abedini, A. A.
Ghiassi, R.
Ardestani, M.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (02) : 381 - 394
[34] Performance of channel prediction using 3D ray-tracing scheme compared to conventional 2D scheme
Jeon, Nam-Ryul
Lee, Chang-Hoon
Kang, Noh-Gyoung
Kim, Seong-Cheol
2006 ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 860 - +
[35] Numerical and experimental investigation of 3D flow field bipolar plates for PEMFCs by metal 3D printing
Lu, Kaijie
Zhang, Jian
Ding, Honghui
Wang, Zhenhao
Pan, Xiaoming
FUEL, 2024, 357
[36] Polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty propagation analysis in numerical homogenization of 2D/3D periodic composite microstructures
Garcia-Merino, J. C.
Calvo-Jurado, C.
Garcia-Macias, E.
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 300
[37] 2D and 3D numerical and experimental analyses of the aerodynamic effects of air fences on a high-speed train
Mohebbi, Masoud
Rezvani, Mohammad Ali
WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 32 (06) : 539 - 550
[38] Using 2D and 3D Modeling and Simulation for Emergency Situations Management
Briano, Enrico
Caballini, Claudia
Mosca, Roberto
Revetria, Roberto
Testa, Alessandro
RECENT ADVANCES IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (CEA 10), 2009, : 131 - +
[39] Impact Dispersion Using 2D and 3D Composite Granular Packing
Sen, Surajit
Mohan, T. R. Krishna
Tiwari, Mukesh
KONA POWDER AND PARTICLE JOURNAL, 2017, (34) : 248 - 257
[40] Simulating and Verifying a 2D/3D Laser Line Sensor Measurement Algorithm on CAD Models and Real Objects
Belsak, Rok
Gotlih, Janez
Karner, Timi
SENSORS, 2024, 24 (22)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →