Flow structure in a compound channel: Benchmarking 2D and 3D numerical models

被引：0

作者：

Kimura, I. ^{[1
]}

Bousmar, D. ^{[2
]}

Archambeau, P. ^{[3
]}

Dewals, B. ^{[3
]}

Erpicum, S. ^{[3
]}

Pirotton, M. ^{[3
]}

Li, X. ^{[3
]}

Dordevic, D. ^{[4
]}

Rosic, N. ^{[4
]}

Zindovic, B. ^{[4
]}

Echeverribar, I. ^{[5
]}

Navas Montilla, A. ^{[5
]}

Brufau, P. ^{[5
]}

Garcia Navarro, M. P. ^{[5
]}

de Linares, M. Gonzales ^{[6
]}

Paquier, A. ^{[7
]}

Kopmann, R. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Toyama, Toyama, Japan

[2] Serv Publ Wallonie, Chatelet, Belgium

[3] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium

[4] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

[5] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

[6] Artelia, Echirolles, France

[7] Inrae Riverly, Villeurbanne, France

[8] Fed Waterways Engn & Res Inst, Karlsruhe, Germany

来源：

RIVER FLOW 2022 | 2024年

关键词：

SHALLOW; SIMULATION;

D O I：

10.1201/9781003323037-8

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The benchmarking test of 2D and 3D numerical models on a compound channel flow with a rectangular shaped main channel and a rectangular shaped floodplain was carried out by the IAHR Working Group on Compound Channels. The selected test case is the flume experiment by Nezu and Tominaga (1991). Nine depth-averaged 2D models and four 3D models participated in the benchmark. In the 2D models, the depth averaged streamwise velocity profiles in the lateral direction were compared. In the 3D models, velocity components in three directions as well as the distribution of the turbulence kinetic energy in a cross-section were compared. Through the comparison, the applicability and limitations of each model are highlighted and discussed with regard to the model characteristics.

引用

页码：51 / 60

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] Numerical observations of turbulence structure modification in channel flow over 2D and 3D rough walls
De Marchis, M.
Milici, B.
Napoli, E.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2015, 56 : 108 - 123
[2] Particle-based adaptive coupling of 3D and 2D fluid flow models
Suchde, Pratik
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 429
[3] Flow channel design in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell: From 2D to 3D
Shen, Jun
Tu, Zhengkai
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (05) : 3087 - 3098
[4] Numerical analysis of sedimentation of a 2D or 3D cold particle
Maunoury, Aurelie
Le Bot, Cedric
Arquis, Eric
MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 37 (05) : 500 - 503
[5] Improving the efficiency of perovskite photovoltaics using a hierarchical 2D/3D/2D structure
Mohammed, Mustafa K. A.
Abdulzahraa, Haider G.
Salih, Ethar Yahya
Kanjariya, Prakash
Rajiv, Asha
Rahman, Md. Ferdous
Akman, Erdi
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2025, 49 (15) : 6346 - 6359
[6] 3D localization in a channel waveguide in a photonic crystal with 2D periodicity
Kuchinsky, S
Allan, DC
Borrelli, NF
Cotteverte, JC
OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 175 (1-3) : 147 - 152
[7] Mechanical Modelling of Pultrusion Process: 2D and 3D Numerical Approaches
Baran, Ismet
Hattel, Jesper H.
Akkerman, Remko
Tutum, Cem C.
APPLIED COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2015, 22 (01) : 99 - 118
[8] OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS
Soussi, Abdellatif
Bersani, Chiara
Tomasoni, Angela Maria
URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021, 2021, 204 : 117 - 128
[9] Investigation into the impact of the use of 2D/3D digital models on the numerical calculation of the bituminous composites' complex modulus
Tehrani, F. Fakhari
Absi, J.
Allou, F.
Petit, C.
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2013, 79 : 377 - 389
[10] Surface Bound Adsorption in a Microfluidic T-Sensor: Numerical Comparison and Optimization of 2D and 3D Models
Winz, R. M.
Wiechert, W.
von Lieres, E.
EUROSENSORS XXIV CONFERENCE, 2010, 5 : 1272 - 1275

← 1 2 3 4 5 →