Occupational future time perspective and mental health problems across adolescence: Random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis and alternative variations

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Obsuth, Ingrid [2 ]
Zhu, Xinxin [1 ]
Ribeaud, Denis [3 ]
Eisner, Manuel [3 ,4 ]
Murray, Aja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, 7 George Sq, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Clin & Hlth Psychol, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Univ Zurich, Jacobs Ctr Prod Youth Dev, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Cambridge, Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ADHD; externalizing; future time perspective; internalizing; occupational future time perspective; random intercept cross-lagged panel model; METAANALYSIS; ORIENTATION; ACHIEVEMENT; BEHAVIOR; PROGRAM; ADHD; EXPECTATIONS; RESILIENCE; EDUCATION; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/jad.12438
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Adolescence is a crucial developmental stage characterized by escalating mental health issues as well as an increasing awareness of future career possibilities. Occupational future time perspective has been shown to be a promotive factor for social functioning and mental health, and a component in evidence-based clinical practices and randomized controlled trial intervention studies. However, it requires more rigorous and ecological corroboration from longitudinal analysis at the within-person level. Methods: Random intercept cross-lagged panel models with several adjustments and sensitivity analyses were applied to the longitudinal data from the Zurich Project on the Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (Zurich, Switzerland), to analyze how occupational future time perspective and psychological/neurodevelopmental outcomes (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms/externalizing/internalizing problems) covaried across ages 13 (N = 1365), 15 (N = 1446), and 17 (N = 1305) in the years 2016, 2018, and 2020, after controlling for sex (52% male), SES, and school type. Results: A small effect was found in a random intercept cross-lagged panel model whereby occupational future time perspective at age 15 predicted externalizing problems at age 17 (beta = .146, p = .05, [95% CI = 0.000, 0.292]), and in a random intercept (contemporaneous) reciprocal panel model specification attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms at age 17 were contemporaneously associated with occupational future time perspective at age 17 (beta = -.310, p < .05, [95% CI = -0.580, -0.041]). No cross-lagged associations were found to be robust across different model specifications/adjustments. Conclusions: These findings suggest that improving occupational future time perspective may have limited impact on enhancing mental health, offering valuable insights for school-based interventions. Further research and replication are necessary to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 539
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Feelings of not Mattering and Depressive Symptoms From a Temporal Perspective: A Comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Etherson, Marianne E.
    Smith, Martin M.
    Hill, Andrew P.
    Flett, Gordon L.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 40 (01) : 60 - 76
  • [2] On the Importance of Considering Concurrent Effects in Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Modelling: Example Analysis of Bullying and Internalising Problems
    Speyer, Lydia G.
    Zhu, Xinxin
    Yang, Yi
    Ribeaud, Denis
    Eisner, Manuel
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2025, 60 (02) : 328 - 344
  • [3] Leisure Activities as a Driver of Personality Development? A Random-Intercept Cross-lagged Panel Model Across 13 Years in Adulthood
    Sander, Julia
    Schumann, Paul
    Richter, David
    Specht, Jule
    COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [4] Disentangling Italian Mothers' and Fathers' Psychological Control Over Time: A Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
    Basili, Emanuele
    Zuffiano, Antonio
    Pastorelli, Concetta
    Thartori, Eriona
    Lunetti, Carolina
    Favini, Ainzara
    Di Giunta, Laura
    Bacchini, Dario
    Gerbino, Maria
    Lansford, Jennifer E.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (06) : 789 - 800
  • [5] Comparing findings from the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and the monozygotic twin difference cross-lagged panel model: Maladaptive parenting and offspring emotional and behavioural problems
    Kullberg, Marie-Louise J.
    Van Schie, Charlotte C.
    Allegrini, Andrea G.
    Ahmadzadeh, Yasmin
    Wechsler, Daniel L.
    Elzinga, Bernet M.
    McAdams, Tom A.
    JCPP ADVANCES, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [6] Emotional vs. social loneliness and prolonged grief: a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model
    Vedder, Anneke
    O'Connor, Maja
    Boelen, Paul A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [7] The dark triad and bullying in adolescence: A three-wave random intercept cross-lagged panel analysis
    Davis, Adam C.
    Farrell, Ann H.
    Brittain, Heather
    Krygsman, Amanda
    Arnocky, Steven
    Vaillancourt, Tracy
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2022, 96
  • [8] The temporal association between envy and depression symptoms over 6 months: A Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Study
    Mehrabi, Fereshteh
    Iskric, Adam
    Beshai, Shadi
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (11) : 10122 - 10131
  • [9] Bidirectional relations between self-control and cooperation among Japanese preschoolers: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis
    Zhu, Yantong
    Zhu, Zhu
    Jiao, Dandan
    Li, Xiang
    Tanaka, Emiko
    Tomisaki, Etsuko
    Watanabe, Taeko
    Sawada, Yuko
    Matsumoto, Munenori
    Cui, Mingyu
    Liu, Yang
    Anme, Tokie
    EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 64 : 139 - 147
  • [10] Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel frameworks
    Burns, Richard A.
    Crisp, Dimity A.
    Burns, Robert B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 90 (01) : 77 - 91