Nationally representative estimates of food insecurity during COVID-19: An investigation of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale in Australia

被引:1
作者
Temple, Jeromey B. [1 ,2 ]
Grossman, Irina [1 ]
Pollard, Christina [2 ]
Kleve, Sue [3 ]
Booth, Sue [2 ,4 ]
Fry, Jane [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Nutr Dietet & Food, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Life & Med Sci, Hatfield, England
[6] Univ Hertfordshire, Sch Hlth & Social Work, Hatfield, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; food insecurity; Food Insecurity and Experience Scale; HILDA; poverty; SECURITY MEASUREMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/ajs4.375
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to measure the prevalence of food insecurity (FI) in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic using the 8-item Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). Employing the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, Rasch models alongside a discrete method were used to investigate the severity of FI and robustness of the 8-item FIES during 2020-2021. Our results indicate that during 2020-2021, 6.47% of Australians experienced moderate or severe FI and 2.93% experienced severe FI. Validation tests following United Nations guidelines show similar weighted and unweighted results and consistency with the discrete method. Infit and outfit metrics, alongside measures of reliability and residual correlations, were all within the expected range. We conclude that the FIES administered as part of Wave 20 of the HILDA survey was a suitable instrument for measuring the prevalence of FI at a representative population level. Although Australia has been measuring FI for 40 years, it has been characterised by measurement inconsistency, inadequacy and infrequency, resulting in insufficient data for policymaking. Reliable representative population estimates of the extent of FI in Australia provides critical intelligence for an effective policy response.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
ABS, 2023, 2026 Census topic review: phase one directions
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Australian Health Survey: Nutrition First Results-Foods and Nutrients, 2011-12
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Household Food Security in the United States in 2020, Economic Research Report-298
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Announcement of Further Measures to Promote Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank
[5]   Measuring Food Security in the United States for More Than 25 years: History, Methods, Findings, and Opportunities [J].
Arteaga, Irma ;
Wilde, Parke E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2023, 123 (10) :S5-S19
[6]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2023, ABS
[7]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics ABS, 2022, 3.3 Response rates Report on the quality of 2021 Census data: Statistical Independent Assurance Panel to the Australian Statistician Online
[8]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged CARE, 2020, National preventive health strategy 2021-2030
[9]  
Australian Government Department of Social Services, 2023, Living in Australia: the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey
[10]  
Australian Government Department of the Treasury, 1975, C2019C00184 (C11)