Clinical study on mpMRI/TRUS software fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:0
|
作者
Ying, Chen [1 ]
Wang, Yongbo [2 ]
Wang, Jianping [1 ]
Rao, Minghuang [1 ]
Li, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Yongchao [1 ]
Huang, Yujian [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Haicang Hosp, Xiamen 361000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, CiXi Biomed Res Inst, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Putian City, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound; Transperineal prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; SIOG GUIDELINES; LOCAL TREATMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.22514/jomh.2025.008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: To enhance prostate cancer diagnosis, multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) combined with Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) fusionguided biopsy has emerged as a promising technique. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical benefits over traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 83 patients diagnosed between January 2022 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy, while 42 had traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar, facilitating a direct comparison of diagnostic efficacy and complication rates. Results: The fusion-guided group showed a significantly higher detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (21/41 vs. 12/42, p = 0.035). It also detected more clinically significant cases (20/41 vs. 11/42, p = 0.033). Notably, the fusion group experienced fewer complications, including no instances of hematochezia (p = 0.003) or infections (p = 0.012), and reported lower postoperative pain levels (Visual Analog Scale score 1.8 +/- 0.78 vs. 2.33 +/- 1.07, p = 0.012). Conclusions: The integration of mpMRI with TRUS in fusion-guided biopsy enhances the accuracy of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, reduces procedural complications, and minimizes patient discomfort. This approach represents a significant advancement in prostate cancer management, improving both diagnostic outcomes and patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multicenter transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion guided outpatient clinic prostate biopsies under local anesthesia
    Jacewicz, Maciej
    Gunzel, Karsten
    Rud, Erik
    Lauritzen, Peter Maehre
    Galtung, Kristina Flor
    Hinz, Stefan
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Baco, Eduard
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (07) : 432.e1 - 432.e7
  • [42] Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results
    Susanne Tewes
    Katja Hueper
    Dagmar Hartung
    Florian Imkamp
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    Juergen Weidemann
    Stefan Renckly
    Markus A. Kuczyk
    Frank Wacker
    Inga Peters
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 1707 - 1714
  • [43] Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results
    Tewes, Susanne
    Hueper, Katja
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Imkamp, Florian
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Weidemann, Juergen
    Renckly, Stefan
    Kuczyk, Markus A.
    Wacker, Frank
    Peters, Inga
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (11) : 1707 - 1714
  • [44] Multiparametric MRI Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Eliminates the Systemic Prostate Biopsy
    Matulevicius, Augustinas
    Bakavicius, Arnas
    Ulys, Albertas
    Trakymas, Mantas
    Usinskiene, Jurgita
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Sabaliauskaite, Rasa
    Zukauskaite, Kristina
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [45] Multiparametric MRI and MRI/TRUS Fusion Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Kesch, Claudia
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 87 - 98
  • [46] Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla
    M. C. Roethke
    T. H. Kuru
    S. Schultze
    D. Tichy
    A. Kopp-Schneider
    M. Fenchel
    H.-P. Schlemmer
    B. A. Hadaschik
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 344 - 352
  • [47] Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla
    Roethke, M. C.
    Kuru, T. H.
    Schultze, S.
    Tichy, D.
    Kopp-Schneider, A.
    Fenchel, M.
    Schlemmer, H. -P.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : 344 - 352
  • [48] The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Patel, Neal
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Shimpi, Adrian A.
    Weng, Stanley
    Buchmann, Rose M.
    Motanagh, Samaneh
    Wu, Yiyuan
    Banerjee, Samprit
    Khani, Francesca
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [49] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Michael Kongnyuy
    Arvin K. George
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Peter A. Pinto
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17
  • [50] A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection
    Wajswol, Ethan
    Winoker, Jared S.
    Anastos, Harry
    Falagario, Ugo
    Okhawere, Kennedy
    Martini, Alberto
    Treacy, Patrick-Julien
    Voutsinas, Nicholas
    Knauer, Cynthia J.
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Lewis, Sara C.
    Taouli, Bachir A.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (04) : 531 - 540