Clinical study on mpMRI/TRUS software fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:0
|
作者
Ying, Chen [1 ]
Wang, Yongbo [2 ]
Wang, Jianping [1 ]
Rao, Minghuang [1 ]
Li, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Yongchao [1 ]
Huang, Yujian [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Haicang Hosp, Xiamen 361000, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, CiXi Biomed Res Inst, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Putian City, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound; Transperineal prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; SIOG GUIDELINES; LOCAL TREATMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.22514/jomh.2025.008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: To enhance prostate cancer diagnosis, multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) combined with Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) fusionguided biopsy has emerged as a promising technique. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical benefits over traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 83 patients diagnosed between January 2022 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 41 underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy, while 42 had traditional TRUS-guided biopsy. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar, facilitating a direct comparison of diagnostic efficacy and complication rates. Results: The fusion-guided group showed a significantly higher detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (21/41 vs. 12/42, p = 0.035). It also detected more clinically significant cases (20/41 vs. 11/42, p = 0.033). Notably, the fusion group experienced fewer complications, including no instances of hematochezia (p = 0.003) or infections (p = 0.012), and reported lower postoperative pain levels (Visual Analog Scale score 1.8 +/- 0.78 vs. 2.33 +/- 1.07, p = 0.012). Conclusions: The integration of mpMRI with TRUS in fusion-guided biopsy enhances the accuracy of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, reduces procedural complications, and minimizes patient discomfort. This approach represents a significant advancement in prostate cancer management, improving both diagnostic outcomes and patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of MRI/US fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Wu, Jianhong
    Sun, Kening
    Chen, Zhihao
    He, Yijun
    Zhu, Zhenfang
    Xiao, Li
    Sheng, Lu
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2023, 78 (06): : 734 - 736
  • [32] Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions
    Andriy Fedorov
    Siavash Khallaghi
    C. Antonio Sánchez
    Andras Lasso
    Sidney Fels
    Kemal Tuncali
    Emily Neubauer Sugar
    Tina Kapur
    Chenxi Zhang
    William Wells
    Paul L. Nguyen
    Purang Abolmaesumi
    Clare Tempany
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2015, 10 : 925 - 934
  • [33] MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy - initial experience and assessment of the role of contralateral lobe systematic biopsy
    Andras, Iulia
    Crisan, Dana
    Cata, Emanuel
    Tamas-Szora, Attila
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Coman, Radu-Tudor
    Bungardean, Catalina
    Mirescu, Claudiu
    Coman, Ioan
    Crisan, Nicolae
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2019, 21 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [34] MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting
    Schlenker, B.
    Apfelbeck, M.
    Buchner, A.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 70 (04) : 433 - 440
  • [35] Systematic or targeted fusion-guided biopsy
    Handke, Analena Elisa
    Albers, Peter
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Bonekamp, David
    Asbach, Patrick
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (05): : 464 - 472
  • [36] Open-source image registration for MRI-TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Khallaghi, Siavash
    Sanchez, C. Antonio
    Lasso, Andras
    Fels, Sidney
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Sugar, Emily Neubauer
    Kapur, Tina
    Zhang, Chenxi
    Wells, William
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Abolmaesumi, Purang
    Tempany, Clare
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (06) : 925 - 934
  • [37] Use of TDI during MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy for suspected prostate cancer
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Fischer, Thomas
    Stephan, Carsten
    Treskatsch, Selda
    Jacques Baur, Alexander Daniel
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    Hamm, Bernd
    Lerchbaumer, Markus Herbert
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2021, 78 (03) : 259 - 269
  • [38] The learning curve for transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective evaluation of a stepwise approach
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Strauss, David
    Hershenhouse, Jacob S.
    Rodler, Severin
    Cai, Jie
    Liang, Gangning
    Aron, Manju
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Gill, Inderbir
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (01) : 64e1 - 64e10
  • [39] TRUS-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy with template for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Guo, Gang
    Xu, Yong
    Zhang, Xu
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (06) : 4863 - 4867
  • [40] Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool
    Gaziev, Gabriele
    Wadhwa, Karan
    Barrett, Tristan
    Koo, Brendan C.
    Gallagher, Ferdia A.
    Serrao, Eva
    Frey, Julia
    Seidenader, Jonas
    Carmona, Lina
    Warren, Anne
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Doble, Andrew
    Kastner, Christof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (01) : 80 - 86