Maximizing Opinion Polarization Using Double Deep Q-Learning in Social Networks

被引:0
作者
Zareer, Mohamed N. [1 ]
Selmic, Rastko R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2025年 / 13卷
关键词
Social networking (online); Vectors; Mathematical models; Fake news; Data models; Symmetric matrices; Blogs; Stochastic processes; Laplace equations; Heuristic algorithms; Opinion dynamics; consensus; polarization; disagreement; reinforcement learning; artificial intelligence; DYNAMICS; EVOLUTION; TUTORIAL; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3537397
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Social media networks, such as Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), have become crucial platforms for public discourse, but they also contribute to the rise of misinformation and opinion polarization. This polarization has profound social, economic, and political implications, making it a critical area of study. In this research, we investigate the impact of automated adversary agents on social media networks by introducing a novel approach using Double-Deep Q-learning reinforcement learning (RL) to deliberately increase polarization within social media networks. The RL agent requires minimal interaction with the system and can flexibly adapt to changes within the network, allowing it to effectively exploit structural vulnerabilities and amplify divisions among users. By learning how to influence the flow of information, the agent intensifies polarization and disagreement with fewer interventions compared to traditional methods. Through simulations and experiments with real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our RL-based approach significantly outperforms conventional techniques in escalating polarization. These findings underscore the risks posed by such techniques and the urgent need to develop safeguards against malicious manipulation of social media platforms by intelligent adversary agents.
引用
收藏
页码:57398 / 57412
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [2] Opinion Dynamics with Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion
    Abebe, Rediet
    Kleinberg, Jon
    Parkes, David
    Tsourakakis, Charalampos E.
    [J]. KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2018, : 1089 - 1098
  • [3] Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback
    Banisch, S.
    Olbrich, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 43 (02) : 76 - 103
  • [4] Emergence of scaling in random networks
    Barabási, AL
    Albert, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) : 509 - 512
  • [5] Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds
    Becker, Joshua
    Brackbill, Devon
    Centola, Damon
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (26) : E5070 - E5076
  • [6] Social Profiling: A Review, Taxonomy, and Challenges
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Gani, Abdullah
    Lali, Muhammad Ikram Ullah
    Marjani, Mohsen
    Malik, Nadia
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2019, 22 (07) : 433 - 450
  • [7] How bad is forming your own opinion?
    Bindel, David
    Kleinberg, Jon
    Oren, Sigal
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2015, 92 : 248 - 265
  • [8] Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature
    Carpini, MXD
    Cook, FL
    Jacobs, LR
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 7 : 315 - 344
  • [9] Statistical physics of social dynamics
    Castellano, Claudio
    Fortunato, Santo
    Loreto, Vittorio
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) : 591 - 646
  • [10] Chandrasekhar A.G., 2015, TESTING MODELS SOCIA, DOI [10.1257/aer.20180474, DOI 10.1257/AER.20180474]